Go back
retrospective trolling

retrospective trolling

Spirituality

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down


Originally posted by robbie carrobie
its strange that you cannot find the apology, why is known only to you.
Was this part of your apology to divegeester?

"its meant as sarcasm, but there is no sarcasm emoticon so the reader needs to use discernment. Do you think in terms of black and white often, funny or serious? Is everything in your world either funny or serious? If not then your question is rather ill conceived and not very clever." [10th September]

Vote Up
Vote Down

-Removed-
I would like to talk about why you have not issued an apology for calling people, tits, pricks, dicks etc and yet you feel the nesessity to make something of the fact that i did give you an apology for terming you a son of satan, why don't we start there.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by FMF
Was this part of your apology to divegeester?

[b]"its meant as sarcasm, but there is no sarcasm emoticon so the reader needs to use discernment. Do you think in terms of black and white often, funny or serious? Is everything in your world either funny or serious? If not then your question is rather ill conceived and not very clever."
[10th September][/b]
no my apology was i am sorry for calling you a son of Satan again why you cannot find it is known only to you.


Originally posted by robbie carrobie
no my apology was i am sorry for calling you a son of Satan again why you cannot find it is known only to you.
As you can see, there is a lot of evidence that your apology was anything but sincere. You didn't even have the common decency to post it on this forum where you made the accusation. If it were an insincere apology, would you consider it "morally repugnant" by your own standard?

Vote Up
Vote Down


Originally posted by robbie carrobie
no my apology was i am sorry for calling you a son of Satan again why you cannot find it is known only to you.
Was this part of your apology to divegeester?

"I dont think it was abusive, in fact it couldn't have been very abusive he wasn't even offended."

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Ghost of a Duke
And Wednesday's lottery numbers?
There's more chance of that occurring than Robert answering questions in this thread.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by FMF
Was this part of your apology to divegeester?

[b]"I dont think it was abusive, in fact it couldn't have been very abusive he wasn't even offended."
[/b]
this want it either

I've already answered it you weasle's bell-end.

Vote Up
Vote Down

-Removed-
thank you divesgeester truly a reflection of the kind of person you are.

Vote Up
Vote Down

This doesn't seem to be it either

You've been being a dick here for years - divesgeester

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Nor this

Shut up you tit. - divesgeester


Originally posted by robbie carrobie
This doesn't seem to be it either

[b]You've been being a dick here for years
- divesgeester[/b]
Calling someone "the son of Satan" is just about the most nasty thing one Christian can say to another or say to anyone for that matter. Are you equating you calling someone "the son of Satan" with someone thinking you are a "dick" or a "tosser" and saying so?


Originally posted by robbie carrobie
Nor this

[b]Shut up you tit.
- divesgeester[/b]
You called him the "son of Satan". Do you think he really is the "son of Satan"? No. So you apologized. Let's hope it was sincere. If divegeester really does think you are a "tosser", why would he apologize? Wouldn't it be insincere of him to apologize if he really does think you are a "tosser"?


Originally posted by robbie carrobie
I would like to talk about why you have not issued an apology for calling people, tits, pricks, dicks etc and yet you feel the nesessity to make something of the fact that i did give you an apology for terming you a son of satan, why don't we start there.
Is this some kind of "self-retro-trolling"?