25 Apr '12 14:50>
Originally posted by jaywillHallelujah
VenomFangX talks about Science and Scientism:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y184H70tM3o&feature=relmfu
Originally posted by jaywillim sure the bible has inspired many things, some great art for a start, brilliant comedy and science according to the video. getting inspiration from something doesnt mean what inspired you to do science was science itself.
Thunderfoot, hefty YouTube Atheist, challenged VenomFangX, YouTube Christian apologist, to produce a scientific advancement inspired by anything written in the bible.
According to Rational Round Table host Michael J. Crawford, VenomFangX answered the challenged with a verse from the book of Psalms.
Interested in Crawford's critique on the debate b ...[text shortened]... oot ? [b]8:10 specifically on the video
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eYk0xN9nzUQ[/b]
Originally posted by stellspalfieSounds good to me. HalleluYah !!! Praise the Lord! 😏
im sure the bible has inspired many things, some great art for a start, brilliant comedy and science according to the video. getting inspiration from something doesnt mean what inspired you to do science was science itself.
it seems to me the bible wants to have its cake and eat it. if something in the bible sounds a bit like a modern scientific the ...[text shortened]... t is because god can do anything. just pick and choose which one you want to suit your argument.
Originally posted by Rank outsiderhumy's post does not contain logical fallacies because IT ASKED QUESTIONS rather than made arguments.
Actually, when I read humy's post, I wondered about this.
I didn't give tim88's post more than a casual glance (for obvious reasons), but humy's post seemed to be saying that the Bible did not predict lots of other scientific facts. This, of itself, does not invalidate the premise behind the post.
Maybe humy meant that there were scientific fact ...[text shortened]... ood news is that God says he can fit me in next Tuesday, Thursday at the latest. Honest.
Originally posted by Rank outsiderhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hallelujah
If you are going to use this as an argument, then at least spell it correctly (capital Y instead of j) and then insert a smug smiley face after it.
Ron will show you the way. It's a clincher.
Hallelujah, also spelled halleluiah, halleluyah, and the Greek and Latin form alleluia are transliterations of the Hebrew word הללו יה (Modern halleluya, Tiberian halləlûyāh) meaning "Praise Yah" or "Praise Jah, you people".[1][2] "Praise Jah" is a shortened form of "Praise Yahweh",[3][4][5] or, in another transliteration of the name, "Praise Jehovah",[6] It is used in different ways in Christian liturgies.[7] The last syllable is from the first two letters of the name of God, YHWH (also written JHVH). Hallelujah is found primarily in the book of Psalms. The word is used in Judaism as part of the Hallel prayers, and in Christian prayer.[8] It has been accepted into the English language and has a similar pronunciation in many other languages.
Originally posted by tim88We have people who refuse to think on this forum when it comes to the
1. Only in recent years has science discovered that everything we see is composed of invisible atoms. Here, Scripture tells us that the "things which are seen were not made of things which do appear."
2. Medical science has only recently discovered that blood-clotting in a newborn reaches its peak on the eighth day, then drops. The Bible consistently says ...[text shortened]... faith based on established evidence." (11:3 continued
Originally posted by RJHindsmaybe you would like to step up to the plate for timmy and walk us through googlefudges riposte point by point? time for you to shine big guy.
We have people who refuse to think on this forum when it comes to the
recognition of the truth in the Holy Bible. I think googlefudge is a perfect
example for you.
Originally posted by humyNot only do you misrepresent what the Holy Bible says, you also misrepresent
Science tells us that we and life evolved via Darwinian natural selection and the Earth and the universe is billions of years old -is this contradicted by the literal interpretation of the Bible?
Also: thunder and lighting isn't caused by a god being angry but is cause by electricity and atoms are made of electrons, protons and neutrons and gravity curves sp ...[text shortened]... mc2 and …. need I go on?
How well did religious scripture explain all these significant facts?
Originally posted by RJHindsAnd here we have the proof.
Not only do you misrepresent what the Holy Bible says, you also misrepresent
science facts. You do not know the difference between science fact and science
fiction. 😏
Originally posted by stellspalfieDon't have time right now. I have to leave to go to the pharmacy
maybe you would like to step up to the plate for timmy and walk us through googlefudges riposte point by point? time for you to shine big guy.