Originally posted by FetchmyjunkIf you think you have been misunderstood with regard to the stance you appeared to be taking on page 2 in the context of the sexual abuse - and cover up thereof - that is under discussion, then just clarify now. You appeared to be arguing that "the organization" is not liable or obliged to report serious sex crimes - which is a stance that JWs have taken on this forum - but then by page 3 and 4 you seemed to have dropped that. Just clarify it if you think you have been misunderstood.
Which post of mine explicitly suggests to you that I was supporting the cover ups?
Originally posted by FMFI asked whether organizers should be held liable if individuals did not report the matter. Do you think I was taking a stance with my question? 🙄
If you think you have been misunderstood with regard to the stance you appeared to be taking on page 2 in the context of the sexual abuse - and cover up thereof - that is under discussion, then just clarify now. You appeared to be arguing that "the organization" is not liable or obliged to report serious sex crimes - which is a stance that JWs have taken on this ...[text shortened]... and 4 you seemed to have dropped that. Just clarify it if you think you have been misunderstood.