May I propose a discussion between myself and a Christian who shall speak on behalf of Christianity.
It will work like this.....
You find a Christian in this forum who will speak for Christianity and then pose some questions (one at a time)......lets start with 20 questions to begin with.
The Christian person can answer first and I will answer second.
The answers would be limited to lets say 15 lines.....there a bouts.
Answers may be given in less time (of course)
I will always answer second because I don't want my answer to influence the other.
Their answer will never influence me.
3 days to complete answering the question and when the question has been answered with no more to say .....it can be announced at the end of the answer by the person the word (FINISHED)
This would be an interesting discussion and you may be the mediator.
No other Christian can answer the question but they may make running comments of a mild nature.
If the whole thing becomes out of hand we shall cease to continue.
There are no winners or losers but we may al learn something......then we are all winners.
Others may comment along the way if they wish but no skylarking please.
Originally posted by DasaQuestion: "If their answer will never influence you" how can you ever hope to learn anything?
May I propose a discussion between myself and a Christian who shall speak on behalf of Christianity.
It will work like this.....
You find a Christian in this forum who will speak for Christianity and then pose some questions (one at a time)......lets start with 20 questions to begin with.
The Christian person can answer first and I will answer second. ...[text shortened]... we are all winners.
Others may comment along the way if they wish but no skylarking please.
Disgraceful.
Originally posted by DasaI would say invite Hinds to your debate. That should be a good match, dogma for dogma.
May I propose a discussion between myself and a Christian who shall speak on behalf of Christianity.
It will work like this.....
You find a Christian in this forum who will speak for Christianity and then pose some questions (one at a time)......lets start with 20 questions to begin with.
The Christian person can answer first and I will answer second. ...[text shortened]... we are all winners.
Others may comment along the way if they wish but no skylarking please.
Originally posted by nook7Your small fault finding brain has missed the point.
Question: "If their answer will never influence you" how can you ever hope to learn anything?
Disgraceful.
An answer heard by another would interfere with the natural tendencies of the answerer to answer naturally........but instead they would edit their answer before posting because of outside influence.
It has nothing to do with learning.
Originally posted by sonhouseDogma can only be attributed to falsity.
I would say invite Hinds to your debate. That should be a good match, dogma for dogma.
Truth cannot be doggmatized.
This is why dogma is attributed only to dishonest science and dishonest religion.
Is it dogma to believe the earth spins?
No because its true.
Your fault finding attitude does not serve you.
Originally posted by DasaI thought you wanted to debate Christian V Dasa?
Dogma can only be attributed to falsity.
Truth cannot be doggmatized.
This is why dogma is attributed only to dishonest science and dishonest religion.
Is it dogma to believe the earth spins?
No because its true.
Your fault finding attitude does not serve you.
From my POV you are both spouting Dogma with a capital D.
Originally posted by FMFI need someone to pose the questions and they might as well find the Christian person also who will comply.
I think the suggestion that you recruit RJHinds to your head-to-head debate is a good one.
The person asking the questions could canvas for a Christian speaker.
I would simply be available when it is organized.
This is just an idea that I thought would be interestingly different than what everyone is normally used to.
If it doesn't take then all is well.
Do you want the position?................Sonhouse is not interested.
Originally posted by DasaPM RJHinds and set it up. That's my suggestion. You and he are suited, I think, in terms of things like temperament, imperviousness, earnestness, certainty and intellect.
I need someone to pose the questions and they might as well find the Christian person also who will comply.
The person asking the questions could canvas for a Christian speaker.
I would simply be available when it is organized.
This is just an idea that I thought would be interestingly different than what everyone is normally used to.
If it doesn't take then all is well.
Do you want the position?................Sonhouse is not interested.
Originally posted by DasaMy small fault finding brain.....LMAO
Your small fault finding brain has missed the point.
An answer heard by another would interfere with the natural tendencies of the answerer to answer naturally........but instead they would edit their answer before posting because of outside influence.
It has nothing to do with learning.
In all your spamming l mean, trolling l mean posting on this site l have never seen you even attempt to take into real consideration anything presented to you.
Dont let my feeble intellect get in the way of your crusade. You just keep spouting your insane mantra. l am sure many will flock to your banner - l can see the results so far on this site. Your successful engaging nature has made you a most welcome and popular poster.
Originally posted by DasaFundamental problem: No human can "speak for Christianity."
May I propose a discussion between myself and a Christian who shall speak on behalf of Christianity.
It will work like this.....
You find a Christian in this forum who will speak for Christianity and then pose some questions (one at a time)......lets start with 20 questions to begin with.
The Christian person can answer first and I will answer second. ...[text shortened]... we are all winners.
Others may comment along the way if they wish but no skylarking please.