Spectators in Hell

Originally posted by Zahlanzi
"So why believe in a God at all?"
this would need a complex answer.

"You blaspheme him day in and day out anyways,"
ha! no, dear. i "blaspheme" the monster depicted in the bible, the monster you worship. i placed the quotes because it is really not blaspheming when you point out how ridiculous a fictional character is.

your god is no more real than Jason Vorhees but he has a much larger body count.

You're a real sociopath, aren't you?

Originally posted by Proper Knob
Anyone with a reading age in the teenage years, and not blinded by cognitive dissonance brought on by religious indoctrination, can see that the definition I provided fits perfectly. That you choose not to see it is of course hardly surprising.

I'm asking what you would call the extermination of a few billion people if genocide is not the correct terminology.

As I have stated it entirely depends upon what they were killed for.

Originally posted by Suzianne
You're a real sociopath, aren't you?

Yes, because anyone who objects to worshipping a genocidal, murdering, torturing,
slavery promoting, totalitarian bigot must have something wrong with them...

Wow has your religion destroyed your morality.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
As I have stated it entirely depends upon what they were killed for.

And again...

Wow has your religion destroyed your morality.

Originally posted by googlefudge
Yes, because anyone who objects to worshipping a genocidal, murdering, torturing,
slavery promoting, totalitarian bigot must have something wrong with them...

Wow has your religion destroyed your morality.

Funny. I was thinking the same of you.

Originally posted by Suzianne
Funny. I was thinking the same of you.

Well you believe that I deserve to be murdered, so naturally you have no clue about morality.

Originally posted by googlefudge
And again...

Wow has your religion destroyed your morality.

It has nothing to do with my religion or my morality and everything to do with logic and reason. I really wish that you would address the substance rather than make these R J Hinds/divesjeester/suzziannesque logical fallacies.

My religious belief is that there is no hell, now I will now take you to task and ask you in what sense has my religious belief or my morality influenced my argument.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
It has nothing to do with my religion or my morality and everything to do with logic and reason. I really wish that you would address the substance rather than make these R J Hinds/divesjeester/suzziannesque logical fallacies.

My religious belief is that there is no hell, now I will now take you to task and ask you in what sense has my religious belief or my morality influenced my argument.

I didn't make a logical fallacy, to have made a logical fallacy I would have had to have made an
argument. I didn't make an argument, I made a comment. Thus I cannot have made a logical fallacy.

My religious belief is that there is no hell, now I will now take you to task and ask you in what
sense has my religious belief or my morality influenced my argument.

Well you are being asked a question of morality.

Assuming you are not typing random gibberish and mean what you say, then it would generally be
assumed that your morality would influence your answers to moral questions.

I mean, if your morality does not influence your answers to moral questions, I have to ask the question
as to whether you in fact have any morality?

I know that your religion does not include a belief in hell. That doesn't mean it doesn't effect your morality.

As for HOW it effects your morality..

Well it apparently causes you to need to know why BILLIONS of people were killed in order to determine if
genocide has taken place and a crime been committed.

Originally posted by googlefudge
I didn't make a logical fallacy, to have made a logical fallacy I would have had to have made an
argument. I didn't make an argument, I made a comment. Thus I cannot have made a logical fallacy.

[quote]My religious belief is that there is no hell, now I will now take you to task and ask you in what
sense has my religious belief or my morality infl ...[text shortened]... ople were killed in order to determine if
genocide has taken place and a crime been committed.

On the contrary you made a claim that my religion has destroyed my morality. Furthermore it was in response to an argument that I had proffered so no you are not going to flim flam yourself out of this one.

No i wasn't being asked a question on morality, i was being asked a question on what we should term those who have been allegedly murdered en mass. If you cannot get that correct then what hope is there for you, it was you infact that viewed it through the lens of morality, I was simply content to use reason entirely detached of morality!

Now if you will pull yourself together and try to refrain from further slobber i really do wish you would refrain from assumptions. Its tiresome to have to point them out.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
As I have stated it entirely depends upon what they were killed for.

How about 'rejecting the Lord Jesus', this is after all the topic of my discussion in this thread.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
As I have stated it entirely depends upon what they were killed for.

Are Islamic State committing acts of genocide in your view?

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
On the contrary you made a claim that my religion has destroyed my morality. Furthermore it was in response to an argument that I had proffered so no you are not going to flim flam yourself out of this one.

A logical fallacy is a flaw in the structure of an argument. Without an argument for there to
be a flaw in, there can be no logical fallacy. I didn't make an argument, I made a statement,
a comment.

You apparently disagree with that statement, and you are completely free to do so.

However that still doesn't make that statement any sort of logical fallacy.

The fact that my statement had no logical flaws doesn't make it true, it just means that you
cannot justifiably complain that it's logically fallacious.

Originally posted by Proper Knob
How about 'rejecting the Lord Jesus', this is after all the topic of my discussion in this thread.

rejection of the Lord Jesus Christ will result ultimately in death. Either naturally or at the hands of gods divine army.

Originally posted by googlefudge
A logical fallacy is a flaw in the structure of an argument. Without an argument for there to
be a flaw in, there can be no logical fallacy. I didn't make an argument, I made a statement,
a comment.

You apparently disagree with that statement, and you are completely free to do so.

However that still doesn't make that statement any sort of logic ...[text shortened]... ke it true, it just means that you
cannot justifiably complain that it's logically fallacious.

fine , whatever.