-Removed-I have not failed in anything, its still a matter of wonderment to me how you can go to church and come out after the service and lynch people, mutilate them, invite your family and friends to watch and send postcards about it. your obligatory attempt to reduce it to a personal level was simply aside show, i merely humoured you.
Originally posted by FMFhis attempt to state that we are more morally culpable and reprehensible because of our stance on blood transfusions is motivated by hatred. He knows that in the case of minors its an extremely emotive subject and he will utilise that in an attempt to either draw attention way from the issue that i raised or attempt to discredit it me in some other way. He did after all state that I would let a child die, did he not? Does that appear to you to be a man possessed of compassion and understanding? Well you will provide evidence of his compassion and understanding and I will accept it, So far you seem unable to do so.
What evidence do you have that he is "equally as hateful" as people who strung up blacks by their necks to murder them?
Originally posted by FMFHe made the comparison between out stance on blood and minors and the 4000 persons who were mutilated and lynched stating that we were more morally reprehensible. That is the second or third time i have told you i will not do so again.
How is divegeester "winning 4000 persons mutilated and lynched to nil"?
Originally posted by robbie carrobieBut divegeester has not lynched or mutilated anyone. Where do you get the "4,000" from?
He made the comparison between out stance on blood and minors and the 4000 persons who were mutilated and lynched stating that we were more morally reprehensible.