23 Jul '13 13:20>
thou shall not kill
thou shall not murder
funny how things change so conveniently
thou shall not murder
funny how things change so conveniently
Originally posted by RJHindsI think you will find that many soldiers do kill babies. Even Gods soldiers:
No. Soldiers do not try to kill innocent babies.
The Instructor
1 Samuel 15
3 Now go, attack the Amalekites and totally destroy everything that belongs to them. Do not spare them; put to death men and women, children and infants, cattle and sheep, camels and donkeys.’ ”
Originally posted by twhitehead
I think you will find that many soldiers do kill babies. Even Gods soldiers:1 Samuel 15cattle and sheep, camels and donkeys.’ ”
3 Now go, attack the Amalekites and totally destroy everything that belongs to them. Do not spare them; put to death men and women, children and [b]infants,
Originally posted by stellspalfieNo. I at least value my own life, which is not in the womb. Why don't you value life when it is in the womb? There would have not been a Royal baby born in Britain yesterday, if Kate had felt the same as you do.
but they do abort the lives of other humans. do you only value life if its in the womb?
Originally posted by RJHindsAnd?
There would have not been a Royal baby born in Britain yesterday, if Kate had felt the same as you do.
The Instructor
Originally posted by RJHindsi couldnt give a crap about the royal baby any more than i give a crap about any other baby born in the world.
No. I at least value my own life, which is not in the womb. Why don't you value life when it is in the womb? There would have not been a Royal baby born in Britain yesterday, if Kate had felt the same as you do.
The Instructor
Originally posted by googlefudgeWomen have other choices that do not require the murder of an unborn baby. There are other medical procedures to prevent pregnacy in the first place and they don't have to have sexual intercourse. If they refuse to do that and don't take the proper precautions, then they can turn the baby over to an adoption agency.
And?
Kate wanted a baby and was able to have one relatively safely because of the
modern medicine and healthcare available to her.
Had she not wanted one at this time then she had that option as well.
Having a child is a major undertaking which brings with it not inconsiderable
risks to the mothers health, both physical and mental, and it does ...[text shortened]... hat would violate the freedom of, and from, religion we all [should] value so highly.
Originally posted by stellspalfieYes, I understand that you do not give a crap about the unborn baby; but thanks for making it clear that you also don't give a crap about any baby born in the world.
i couldnt give a crap about the royal baby any more than i give a crap about any other baby born in the world.
you joined the army..........a professional human aborting organisation. one that excels in aborting humans in various grizzly ways.
why is it okay for your army to abort humans?
Originally posted by RJHindsPlenty of females get pregnant after being raped, so "they don't have to have sexual intercourse" only applies to those who choose to do so. Similarly, not all females wait until adulthood to have sex, mostly because they are with males who are unwilling to wait until adulthood to have sex. A woman or girl who isn't in a relationship and not planning to have consensual sex shouldn't be burdened with taking birth control on the off chance that some scumbag attacks her.
Women have other choices that do not require the murder of an unborn baby. There are other medical procedures to prevent pregnacy in the first place and they don't have to have sexual intercourse. If they refuse to do that and don't take the proper precautions, then they can turn the baby over to an adoption agency.
The Instructor
Originally posted by SahuaroI some scumbag rapes a women, he should be strung up by his balls in public, then executed.
Plenty of females get pregnant after being raped, so "they don't have to have sexual intercourse" only applies to those who choose to do so. Similarly, not all females wait until adulthood to have sex, mostly because they are with males who are unwilling to wait until adulthood to have sex. A woman or girl who isn't in a relationship and not planning to ha ...[text shortened]... dn't be burdened with taking birth control on the off chance that some scumbag attacks her.
Originally posted by RJHindsSo you are perfectly fine with murder as long as its against fully formed sentient beings.
I some scumbag rapes a women, he should be strung up by his balls in public, then executed.
The Instructor
Originally posted by RJHindsSo its OK to murder innocent little babies if they might pose a threat to the Israelites?
In the case of the Amalekites, they could have had some kind of contagious disease that required everything belonging to them needing to be destroyed, so the Israelites would not be contaminated. We don't know and should not try to put ourselves in position of a judge of things we know little about.
Originally posted by SahuaroAll absolutely true.
Plenty of females get pregnant after being raped, so "they don't have to have sexual intercourse" only applies to those who choose to do so. Similarly, not all females wait until adulthood to have sex, mostly because they are with males who are unwilling to wait until adulthood to have sex. A woman or girl who isn't in a relationship and not planning to ha ...[text shortened]... dn't be burdened with taking birth control on the off chance that some scumbag attacks her.