08 Jul '17 17:48>
Originally posted by caissad4Our views of facts must differ, mine are that if its a fact nothing could enter the picture and
Yes, archaeological fact. The Vedas tell of the great city of Krishna existing some 9000 years ago along a river in India. Rising sea levels engulfed the city and the people moved north according to the Vedas. This was believed to be a myth until a series of buildings were found under sea along an ancient riverbed. The numerous structures stretch 6km (that ...[text shortened]... dated over 8500 years old. There is archaeological evidence of the movement of the people north.
change how we view it. A fact doesn't change with additional information, it would simply
be validated, and dating methods as near as I can tell have never fallen in to that category
when we start speaking about the distant past.