- Joined
- 16 Feb 08
- Moves
- 117594
06 Sep 14
1 edit
Originally posted by robbie carrobieLol, you crack me up.
evidence, logic, reason and scriptural references were all provided, that you failed to follow the lines of reasoning is your affair, personally i wont waste any more time remonstrating with balloon heads like you.
You feel compelled to reply to my post but don't want to contravene your super-fresh "ignore divegeester" tactic' so you reply without clicking rely and quote.
- Joined
- 16 Feb 08
- Moves
- 117594
06 Sep 14
Originally posted by robbie carrobiePlease provide the scripture references then, neither you nor Galveston have done so for over 1300 posts. This whole facade you two are putting up is hilarious.
evidence, logic, reason and scriptural references were all provided, that you failed to follow the lines of reasoning is your affair, personally i wont waste any more time remonstrating with balloon heads like you.
12 Sep 14
I just heard Stan Deyo on Coast to Coast AM (hey, what else am I going to listen to on the radio in the middle of the night?) the other night and he claims to have figured out exactly where the Garden of Eden is.
I haven't bothered to check his claims, but he has a website (www.standeyo.com), maybe someone could go check it out.
12 Sep 14
1 edit
Originally posted by SuzianneI was suffering through a night of insomnia and just happened to catch a part of that broadcast. But a call was taken (during the interview I think) from a guy claiming to be from the future. What was that all about? I listened for a minute or two and then turned the radio off.
I just heard Stan Deyo on Coast to Coast AM (hey, what else am I going to listen to on the radio in the middle of the night?) the other night and he claims to have figured out exactly where the Garden of Eden is.
I haven't bothered to check his claims, but he has a website (www.standeyo.com), maybe someone could go check it out.
The guy talking about Eden seemed to be making some sense. I don't know how much of what he was saying could actually be verified or not, but he didn't sound like a total nutcase. But then the host let some caller from the future weigh in with his message from the future, and the nutty caller completely ruined it for me. Was the interview over and the host was moving on to something else, or was that call supposed to be relevant to what the Eden guy was saying?
12 Sep 14
Originally posted by lemon limeSo you believe in the garden of eden and this guy supposedly from the future,
I was suffering through a night of insomnia and just happened to catch a part of that broadcast. But a call was taken (during the interview I think) from a guy claiming to be from the future. What was that all about? I listened for a minute or two and then turned the radio off.
The guy talking about Eden seemed to be making some sense. I don't know how ...[text shortened]... on to something else, or was that call supposed to be relevant to what the Eden guy was saying?
HE'S nuts?
12 Sep 14
Originally posted by sonhouseEinstein's theories show that time travel into the past is impossible. So yeah, I'd call anyone claiming to have traveled back in time to be at best, lying, and at worst, nuts.
So you believe in the garden of eden and this guy supposedly from the future,
HE'S nuts?
12 Sep 14
1 edit
Originally posted by SuzianneActually, Big Al didn't proscribe time travel into the past, there are theories that may allow just that to happen. The problem for Big Al was the paradoxes it could entail, go back, off your granpa kind of thing.
Einstein's theories show that time travel into the past is impossible. So yeah, I'd call anyone claiming to have traveled back in time to be at best, lying, and at worst, nuts.
I was just pointing out your garden thing was just a tale, not reality.
For instance, in that particular tale, your deity made the Earth and everything here and then made a man.
But for some reason, this deity couldn't make a woman like it made the man, needing to have a template of a rib? I think you know men don't have one less rib than women, right?
So there was no need for a deity to actually need a rib, but that is what the writers of the story put in there for some reason or other.
Doesn't that kind of thing even make a crack in your absolute faith of this ancient creation tale supposedly words from a deity, of which there are thousands of others with their own tale AND the 6 day creation tale was taken from earlier Egyptian 6 day creation tales thousands of years older than the Jewish version.
Doesn't that make you wonder about that, just a little?
12 Sep 14
Originally posted by sonhouseNo, come on, Einstein's equations themselves DO preclude time travel into the past. You should know this. Theories that supposedly allow it are just that, theories.
Actually, Big Al didn't proscribe time travel into the past, there are theories that may allow just that to happen. The problem for Big Al was the paradoxes it could entail, go back, off your granpa kind of thing.
I was just pointing out your garden thing was just a tale, not reality.
For instance, in that particular tale, your deity made the Earth and ...[text shortened]... years older than the Jewish version.
Doesn't that make you wonder about that, just a little?
Also, on the Adam's rib thing: Do you really think that the average Hebrew of Moses' time could understand DNA, or its role in supplying a "blueprint" of man? Now say to him that God took a rib from Adam and made a woman, and *that* they can understand. You only have to use some common sense. (Haha, ready for the meltdown to follow...)