Go back
The googlefudge disgruntled atheist insult thread

The googlefudge disgruntled atheist insult thread

Spirituality

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by ThinkOfOne
[b]I have behaved admirably under the circumstances conducting myself with decorum in the face of vile and still unsubstantiated accusations.

Yet more evidence of your dishonesty. The above is a flat out lie and everyone knows it including you. I have a friend who is a habitual liar like you, but at least she can bring herself to admit it when confronted by the evidence. You're a real piece of work.[/b]
Is this evidence of your honesty ? How so?

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
unworthy of serious comment, your not Scottish Tomo, your Canadian or American,
you may have Scottish blood in you but simply because you fly the saltire doesn't
make you any more Scottish than it makes true your assertion. Its simply another, it
must be true because i say its true. You have provided not one shred of evidence to
back up you ...[text shortened]... ts true? Join the ranks of those who believe their own propaganda, the forum is full of
them.
originally posted by googlefudge

...Noisy (is that in insult, really?) was against you...



originally posted by robbie carrobie

...so lets get this, you have been caught lying twice now, attempting to state that you did not term me 'noisy' which you did...

Vote Up
Vote Down

Evidently RC believes that citing one incident where he refrained from being dishonest "speaks volumes" in comparison to his repeated and ongoing dishonesty demonstrated on this thread and others. This provides interesting insight into the workings of a habitual liar.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by tomtom232
originally posted by googlefudge

[b]...Noisy (is that in insult, really?) was against you...




originally posted by robbie carrobie

...so lets get this, you have been caught lying twice now, attempting to state that you did not term me 'noisy' which you did...[/b]
if you remove 'noisy' which is only an insult in your deranged little world - googlefudge.

this was my contention, that it was intended as an insult (he later claimed it was a
joke) not that he did or did not utter it and you in your failure to understand this have
wrongly assumed that i was claiming something else, please stop projecting your
inability to accurately discern the intent of a poster and making insinuations of the basis
of this lack of discernment. Its probably the result of a self assuming disposition, you
may like to think about that.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by ThinkOfOne
Evidently RC believes that citing one incident where he refrained from being dishonest "speaks volumes" in comparison to his repeated and ongoing dishonesty demonstrated on this thread and others. This provides interesting insight into the workings of a habitual liar.
Do you have any evidence of your honesty thinkofone, have you found a wallet and
handed it in to police, have you refused to receive or give a bribe? Have you chopped
down a cherry tree and admitted it to your father when asked about it? Have you
confessed your sins? What evidence have you for your honesty, can you not provide a
single iota? why not? otherwise how are we to understand whether you really are
honest and if not, then it casts a tall shadow across all your posts.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
Do you have any evidence of your honesty thinkofone, have you found a wallet and
handed it in to police, have you refused to receive or give a bribe? Have you chopped
down a cherry tree and admitted it to your father when asked about it? Have you
confessed your sins? What evidence have you for your honesty, can you not provide a
single iota ...[text shortened]... d whether you really are
honest and if not, then it casts a tall shadow across all your posts.
Evidently RC believes that citing one incident where he refrained from being dishonest "speaks volumes" in comparison to his repeated and ongoing dishonesty demonstrated on this thread and others. This provides interesting insight into the workings of a habitual liar.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by ThinkOfOne
Evidently RC believes that citing one incident where he refrained from being dishonest "speaks volumes" in comparison to his repeated and ongoing dishonesty demonstrated on this thread and others. This provides interesting insight into the workings of a habitual liar.
ride on time!

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
if you remove 'noisy' [b]which is only an insult in your deranged little world - googlefudge.

this was my contention, that it was intended as an insult (he later claimed it was a
joke) not that he did or did not utter it and you in your failure to understand this have
wrongly assumed that i was claiming something else, please stop projecti ...[text shortened]... . Its probably the result of a self assuming disposition, you
may like to think about that.[/b]
It might have been your 'contention' however what you SAID was

"...you have been caught lying twice now, attempting to state that you did not term me 'noisy' which you did..."


Which is false and lie.

I did 'term you noisy' and said so.

It wasn't however an insult it was a joke as any 5 yr old could tell from the context.

The context being this...


"Originally posted by robbie carrobie
I haven't ducked out nor am i angry, i simply have nothing to say to you, nor have you
anything of value to impart to me.



Yet you keep talking.

You are very noisy for someone with nothing to say."




Unfortunately you have neither the wit nor the intellect of a 5 yr old and thus took offence...

THAT was an insult.



Can you tell the difference?

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by googlefudge
It might have been your 'contention' however what you SAID was

"...you have been caught lying twice now, attempting to state that you did not term me 'noisy' which you did..."


Which is false and lie.

I did 'term you noisy' and said so.

It wasn't however an insult it was a joke as any 5 yr old could tell from the context.

Th and thus took offence...

THAT was an insult.



Can you tell the difference?
Humour is not something I generally ascribe to atheists, they seem to me, with a few
exceptions (beetle and Pk being two), to be rather humourless, in fact i think of
them as Vulcan's with pointy ears, computing constantly and trying to assess those
values which are contrary to logic, laughter constituting a mild form of hysteria etc. I
expect your no different really, this does not compute! this does not compute.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
Humour is not something I generally ascribe to atheists, they seem to me, with a few
exceptions (beetle and Pk being two), to be rather humourless, in fact i think of
them as Vulcan's with pointy ears, computing constantly and trying to assess those
values which are contrary to logic, laughter constituting a mild form of hysteria etc. I
expect your no different really, this does not compute! this does not compute.
Well more fool you then.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by googlefudge
Well more fool you then.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tLgNZ9aTEwc
tell me truly are your ears a little pointy or not?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
tell me truly are your ears a little pointy or not?
Spock (and Vulcan's in general) are not logical or rational.

While emotions are indeed often unhelpful in coming to a logical conclusion about deciding
the best way to achieve your goals they are essential in deciding what goals to have and
caring that they are achieved.

As for a sense of humour, Need I point out the large number of comedians who are atheists
and pro science?

&feature=related

&feature=related

The video I linked is Julia Galef giving a presentation at skepticon talking about the 'straw Vulcan'
fallacy about rationality and logic that you so evidently subscribe to.
You should watch it, and learn something.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by googlefudge
Spock (and Vulcan's in general) are not logical or rational.

While emotions are indeed often unhelpful in coming to a logical conclusion about deciding
the best way to achieve your goals they are essential in deciding what goals to have and
caring that they are achieved.

As for a sense of humour, Need I point out the large number of comedians w lity and logic that you so evidently subscribe to.
You should watch it, and learn something.
you dont think i actually believe my own propaganda do you? 🙂

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
you dont think i actually believe my own propaganda do you? 🙂
Well certainly nobody else does.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by googlefudge
Well certainly nobody else does.
na na you believed it and even posted a chick demonstrating a rebuttal!