The name of Jehovah means nothing to them?

Originally posted by menace71
The same argument your making can be used against you. Just silly.



Manny

Another Epic FAIL, i have just provided a contextual scriptural example where worship
is linked with rendering sacred service, you do read English, you can put the
constituent parts of a sentence together so as to form a whole? Not only that i have
provided the direct quotation from the Hebrew scriptures which demonstrates that not
only is it to be exclusively venerated with regards to the father alone, but that it
mentions the father by name. I dont mean to be rude but the level of ignorance
among professed christians for the scriptural text is astounding. I wouldn't mention
silly if I were you, your opinions have no relevance to me or anyone else for that
matter. Contextual evidence for rendering the term worship in the case of Christ, nil!

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
Contextual evidence for rendering the term worship in the case of Christ, nil!

This only works if one accepts the interrelated and interdependent assertions that you carefully place upon each other. In other words, this is only "true" if one accepts your circular logic. [See my above posts.]

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
At Matthew 4:10, Jesus said: “You shall worship [from proskyneo] the Lord your God
and him only shall you serve.” (At Deuteronomy 6:13, which Jesus is evidently here
quoting, appears the personal name of God, the Tetragrammaton, JHWH.) In harmony
with that, we must understand that it is proskyneo with a particular attitude of heart
and mind ...[text shortened]... nlineInterlinear/OTpdf/exo6.pdf

http://www.scripture4all.org/OnlineInterlinear/OTpdf/deu6.pdf

The Tetragrammaton, YHWH, first appears in Exocus 3 in which tha angel of the Lord, verse 2, appears to Moses in the midst of a burning bush. Now this angel of the Lord tells Moses that He is the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob (Israel). The one appearing as the angel of the Lord is the Word (the Son) for no man has seen the Father at any time. The Word (the Son) says He is YHWH and tells Moses to call Him YH, which means I AM. In the Gospel of John, Yahshua identifies Himself again as
"I AM".

Jesus said to them, “Most assuredly, I say to you, before Abraham was, I AM.”
(John 8:58 NKJV)
He is the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob and the Creator of heaven and Earth.

HalleluYah !!! Praise the Lord! Holy! Holy! Holy!

Originally posted by RJHinds
The Tetragrammaton, YHWH, first appears in Exocus 3 in which tha angel of the Lord, verse 2, appears to Moses in the midst of a burning bush. Now this angel of the Lord tells Moses that He is the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob (Israel). The one appearing as the angel of the Lord is the Word (the Son) for no man has seen the Father at any time. The Word hn *:58 NKJV)
He is the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob and the Creator of heaven and Earth.

'I am', is not the same as the teragrammaton, you're statement is unworthy of serious
comment. The direct quotation, quoted by Christ at Matthew 4, is a direct quotation
from Deuteronomy 6:13, which actually contains the tretragrammaton, the actual
name of God, the term 'the Lord', is not found in the verse, the actual abbreviated
name of God is.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
'I am', is not the same as the teragrammaton, you're statement is unworthy of serious
comment. The direct quotation, quoted by Christ at Matthew 4, is a direct quotation
from Deuteronomy 6:13, which actually contains the tretragrammaton, the actual
name of God, the term 'the Lord', is not found in the verse, the actual abbreviated
name of God is.

It is hard to get anything through that thick skull of yours. What I am trying to tell you is the one you call Jehovah is the same angel of the Lord that appeared to Moses and later was born in flesh as Yahshua (Jesus).

Originally posted by RJHinds
It is hard to get anything through that thick skull of yours. What I am trying to tell you is the one you call Jehovah is the same angel of the Lord that appeared to Moses and later was born in flesh as Yahshua (Jesus).

again your opinions have no relevance to me, or anyone else other than you for that
matter, we are interested in truth, not mere opinions.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
again your opinions have no relevance to me, or anyone else other than you for that
matter, we are interested in truth, not mere opinions.

That was the truth!

Originally posted by RJHinds
That was the truth!

was it.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
was it.

Yes, I AM is the name of the God of Moses and Abraham and the only Savior and Lord and who we now call Jesus the Christ.

Originally posted by RJHinds
Yes, I AM is the name of the God of Moses and Abraham the only Savior and Lord and who we now call Jesus the Christ.

First of all, 'I am', is not even a good English translation of the Hebrew, secondly, 'I
am', is not the tetragrammaton, you fail fat boy.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
First of all, 'I am', is not even a good English translation of the Hebrew, secondly, 'I
am', is not the tetragrammaton, you fail fat boy.

I think it is. 😏

Originally posted by RJHinds
I think it is. 😏

Of course you do RJH, its an aspect of your religious bias. I dont blame you for it, its
what you've been taught. Yet, it cannot strand up to scriptural examination. In fact, for a member of Christendom, you know your Bible more than many RJH.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
Of course you do RJH, its an aspect of your religious bias.

I would go with I AM THE CAUSE OF BEING, I AM THE BEING or THE BEING (CREATOR) as alternate English translations.

Originally posted by RJHinds
I would go with I AM THE CAUSE OF BEING, I AM THE BEING or THE BEING (CREATOR) as alternate English translations.

I will discuss later, its late RJH, I am tired, provide the basis of your translation and we
can consider it.

Praise Jehovah!!!!