The Neck of the Giraffe

@wolfgang59 said
That's two false beliefs you have now.

What are the false beliefs?

@kellyjay said
You were wrong and I believe you know that now.

There is no shame in not having been involved in the R&D of CPUs - for instance, I have not been involved in this whatsoever. Who are you trying to impress by claiming involvement when clearly you've had none?

@kazetnagorra said
There is no shame in not having been involved in the R&D of CPUs - for instance, I have not been involved in this whatsoever. Who are you trying to impress by claiming involvement when clearly you've had none?

I gathered you had never been involved in either the front end, or back end
processes of CPUs production and R&D. That group is large and diverse as are the
requirements. I'm not sure what you think goes on, but you obviously have no idea.

@kellyjay said
I gathered you had never been involved in either the front end, or back end
processes of CPUs production and R&D. That group is large and diverse as are the
requirements. I'm not sure what you think goes on, but you obviously have no idea.

I dont expect you have been involved with the front end or back end of giraffes.

@kellyjay said
I gathered you had never been involved in either the front end, or back end
processes of CPUs production and R&D. That group is large and diverse as are the
requirements. I'm not sure what you think goes on, but you obviously have no idea.

To have been involved in R&D means you made a direct contribution to the design of CPUs, not just that you were part of the supporting staff.

@kazetnagorra said
To have been involved in R&D means you made a direct contribution to the design of CPUs, not just that you were part of the supporting staff.

Yea right, and you still do know the various things I did. I think I'll leave you where
you are, proclaiming a truth you have no stinking idea about.

@kellyjay said
Yea right, and you still do know the various things I did. I think I'll leave you where
you are, proclaiming a truth you have no stinking idea about.

Whatever it is you did, it wasn't R&D.

@wolfgang59 said
I dont expect you have been involved with the front end or back end of giraffes.

Before changes there was within the lifeform the ability to reproduce its own kind,
its built into all life forms. Then specific alterations supposedly altered its neck and
all of the required elements in the neck to change over time undirected in theory.
The ability to reproduce after its own kind was changing and so the information
that keeps template of that lifeform was being redirected into something new,
this new information came from where? The changes required would have had
to act to alter the length of several things as the neck is composed of more than
a few vital body parts, they all would have had to be altered at the same time to
continue to work together.

@kellyjay said
Before changes there was within the lifeform the ability to reproduce its own kind,
its built into all life forms. Then specific alterations supposedly altered its neck and
all of the required elements in the neck to change over time undirected in theory.
The ability to reproduce after its own kind was changing and so the information
that keeps template of that lifeform ...[text shortened]... al body parts, they all would have had to be altered at the same time to
continue to work together.

WRONG as usual.

@wolfgang59 said
WRONG as usual.

Well if it cannot reproduce what was before there wouldn’t be any life forms.

@wolfgang59 said
WRONG as usual.

Your spouting wrong isn't very useful.
If a life form isn't reproducing after its kind then there would be no life forms.
Changing something within a form requires nothing needed is cut out. For
example the neck cannot change its form and stop allowing food from the mouth
to continue to allow nourishment to the body, air to the lungs and so on. The
brain cannot be disconnected, everything has to be altered without destroying
what was already there and working.

You think I'm in error, explain yourself.
This would be a concert of alterations, not a simple shift in size of beak type.

@kellyjay said
Your spouting wrong isn't very useful.
If a life form isn't reproducing after its kind then there would be no life forms.
Changing something within a form requires nothing needed is cut out. For
example the neck cannot change its form and stop allowing food from the mouth
to continue to allow nourishment to the body, air to the lungs and so on. The
brain cannot be disco ...[text shortened]... explain yourself.
This would be a concert of alterations, not a simple shift in size of beak type.

GIBBERISH as usual.

@wolfgang59 said
GIBBERISH as usual.

Nothing touching the point as usual.
Small wonder you hold on to your beliefs if you refuse to defend them but hang
on to them nonetheless.

@kellyjay said
Before changes there was within the lifeform the ability to reproduce its own kind,
its built into all life forms. Then specific alterations supposedly altered its neck and
all of the required elements in the neck to change over time undirected in theory.
The ability to reproduce after its own kind was changing and so the information
that keeps template of that lifeform ...[text shortened]... al body parts, they all would have had to be altered at the same time to
continue to work together.

New genetic information can arise due to so-called "mutations."