Originally posted by dj2beckerOf course it was a deception. In which post did you tell me that you were the same person as the one who uses the Fetchmyjunk screen name? And why were you pretending that we hadn't had the discussion about 'choosing to be superstitious' before?
Actually if the intention was to pretend to be a different person I would have used a different style and obvious denied that I knew anything about Fetchmyjunk.
Originally posted by dj2beckerFor the first few posts I exchanged with you I had no idea you had switched to an old account. I view that as rude and highly deceptive.
Actually if the intention was to pretend to be a different person I would have used a different style and obvious denied that I knew anything about Fetchmyjunk.
Originally posted by Ghost of a Duke to dj2becker/FetchmyjunkHe had a whole discussion with me using his 'new' name in which he was pretending that he hadn't had that discussion with me relatively recently using the name Fetchmyjunk.
For the first few posts I exchanged with you I had no idea you had switched to an old account. I view that as rude and highly deceptive.
Ghost of a Duke:For the first few posts I exchanged with you I had no idea you had switched to an old account. I view that as rude and highly deceptive.Were the things you claimed about being an adult in his 30s, about being in a cult - and about playing rugby - deceptions too?
Originally posted by dj2becker
Noted, my apologies.
Originally posted by dj2beckerPretty much. Ghost has already hit you with the appropriate counter argument. Billions here hold beliefs which contradict the beliefs of billions there. Both groups can't correctly claim their beliefs are "obvious".
Or are you trying to argue that something that is accepted by more than a billion people is not obvious enough?