Originally posted by @apathistAh Lilith, so easily forgotten.
I realize that you never investigated the bible and its history, its source, the parts left out, the translation issues. The politics involved in building for example a King James version. You are clueless, but just start researching, buddy, you can heal.
I should say cut-n-paste on stuff new to you looks really weak. We are supposed to know, or are trying to know, what we talk about.
https://www.disclose.tv/lilith-was-adams-first-wife-not-eve-but-the-bible-kept-it-secret-315540
Originally posted by @romans1009So you advocate slavery and know women should be subservient.
...
I know enough about how the Bible was put together and am much more interested in what’s in the Bible as the Bible is the inerrant Word of God and has changed countless lives for the better.
Originally posted by @ghost-of-a-dukeThe points in that article have already been debunked (and the debunking was not at all difficult.)
Ah Lilith, so easily forgotten.
https://www.disclose.tv/lilith-was-adams-first-wife-not-eve-but-the-bible-kept-it-secret-315540
Originally posted by @ghost-of-a-dukeThe first libber! Of course the church tries to ignore her, and plan B is to demonize her.
Ah Lilith, so easily forgotten.
https://www.disclose.tv/lilith-was-adams-first-wife-not-eve-but-the-bible-kept-it-secret-315540[/b]
Originally posted by @romans1009You have an inner skeptic! Try to nurture that and make it consistent.
The points in that article have already been debunked (and the debunking was not at all difficult.)
Originally posted by @romans1009I'm sorry that the inerrant word of god disturbs you?
We (meaning the forum) have already been through this on separate threads. Really not interested in rehashing it unless you can bring something new to the table.
Originally posted by @apathistI was very skeptical of Jesus Christ’s Resurrection before I became a Christian and did not believe it until I had spent months investigating the evidence for it.
You have an inner skeptic! Try to nurture that and make it consistent.
I guess the difference between you and me is I actually looked into the evidence.
Originally posted by @romans1009The bible isn't kidding and you refer to it as justification of your "mostly" kidding? Aren't aren't you as serious on this as the Bible?
I was (mostly) kidding. Lighten up.
BTW, the Bible said atheists are fools. Who am I to argue with the Bible?
Psalm 14 tells you how God will take care of the "strong atheist" and John 3:18 takes care of the rest of the non-believers. Let's not say it's kidding.
Originally posted by @js357Nitpick much?
The bible isn't kidding and you refer to it as justification of your "mostly" kidding? Aren't aren't you as serious on this as the Bible?
Psalm 14 tells you how God will take care of the "strong atheist" and John 3:18 takes care of the rest of the non-believers. Let's not say it's kidding.
Originally posted by @romans1009Can ideology be elevated, good?
Truth is never corrupted. It may be modified, but then it is no longer truth.
As far as whether ideology is elevated, I suppose that depends on its prior state and how truth is applied (or misapplied) to it.