Originally posted by @bigdoggproblemThe answer to why Job suffered (though Job was never told) is that his persecution by Satan was a test of his faith.
It's a difficult question to answer, regardless of how anyone on either side esteems the asker.
Do you theists not realize that the whole book of Job is spent on this question, and also without answering it?
But one lesson from Job is that suffering is not always the result of sin, that the righteous suffer as well as the unrighteous. This is probably more of an obvious statement today than it was back then.
But the more important lesson from Job, I think, is God doesn’t answer to human beings and doesn’t need to justify Himself or His actions to human beings.
2 edits
Originally posted by @bigdoggproblem
It's a difficult question to answer, regardless of how anyone on either side esteems the asker.
Do you theists not realize that the whole book of Job is spent on this question, and also without answering it?
Do you theists not realize that the whole book of Job is spent on this question, and also without answering it?
Some of us know that whole book of Job is dealing with a question which it leaves unanswered. But the Bible does not leave it altogether unanswered.
I agree that the WHY? answer Job seeks for for the entire debate is never answered to him. True.
However, for him to finally come face to face with God satisfies him and also causes him to repent.
Originally posted by @tom-wolseyNo. Can you show a verse that agrees with YOUR CLAIM that adam and eve literally chose to usher in suffering and evil?
Can you show me a verse that says, "but Adam and Eve had no idea babies would get bone cancer in the 20th century."
You look thin, tom. Been eating right?
Originally posted by @apathistThe bible says Adam and Eve chose not to heed God's warning of certain death, in the pursuit of the knowledge of evil ways. The bible says that when Adam and Eve made that choice, they ushered in the curse of pain, suffering and evil.
No. Can you show a verse that agrees with YOUR CLAIM that adam and eve literally chose to usher in suffering and evil?
You look thin, tom. Been eating right?
Originally posted by @romans1009But that was not the question.
The answer to why Job suffered (though Job was never told) is that his persecution by Satan was a test of his faith.
But one lesson from Job is that suffering is not always the result of sin, that the righteous suffer as well as the unrighteous. This is probably more of an obvious statement today than it was back then.
But the more important lesson ...[text shortened]... esn’t answer to human beings and doesn’t need to justify Himself or His actions to human beings.
1 edit
Originally posted by @bigdoggproblemNot to sound obtuse, but what is the question exactly? You quoted an enormous post.
But that was not the question.
Originally posted by @bigdoggproblemThe book of Job does answer the problem.
It's a difficult question to answer, regardless of how anyone on either side esteems the asker.
Do you theists not realize that the whole book of Job is spent on this question, and also without answering it?
Job is tested by a series of evil occurrences, but perserveres through them all, and is then richly rewarded again by God.
And, moreover, this:
. The most righteous man on the earth was thus chosen to be tested. If Job failed, the narrative suggests, then the satan will have made his point. If he succeeded, however, then God’s wisdom and integrity in running the cosmos will have been vindicated. Hence, the protective fence around Job is removed and the satan is allowed to afflict him.
http://reknew.org/2008/01/the-point-of-the-book-of-job/
You can't walk into these arguments with a sort of South Park theology where your purposeful bad take on the book is a stand in for the actual, overall meaning and context.
This is exactly why atheism has a superficial appeal that can pull in a few people but it ultimately sputters out: it doesn't have any truly persuasive message or new analysis.
Originally posted by @tom-wolseyYou speak of Adam and Eve matter of factly, as though their existence wasn't entirely fictional. Which is odd.
It's curious to me that atheists--above all others--argue against freewill. Adam and Eve--obviously not atheists--preferred suffering over 'Pleasantville.'[/b]
Our species evolved sir. Catch up!
Originally posted by @tom-wolseyThe question is, Why do bad things happen to good people?
Not to sound obtuse, but what is the question exactly? You quoted an enormous post.
1 edit
Originally posted by @philokalia"...purposeful bad take"? Nah, sorry, claim rejected. There's nothing wrong with struggling with a question without a definitive result. That is your assumption, not mine.
The book of Job does answer the problem.
Job is tested by a series of evil occurrences, but perserveres through them all, and is then richly rewarded again by God.
And, moreover, this:
[quote]. The most righteous man on the earth was thus chosen to be tested. If Job failed, the narrative suggests, then the satan will have made his point. If he ...[text shortened]... le but it ultimately sputters out: it doesn't have any truly persuasive message or new analysis.
Edit: and a guy like you could learn a LOT from South Park. [That is not an insult.]
Originally posted by @bigdoggproblemBecause bad people exist in the world? Because people have free will to be bad or good? Because the effects of sin are not confined to bad people?
The question is, Why do bad things happen to good people?
Originally posted by @ghost-of-a-dukeThe theory of evolution has significant, and, in my view, fatal flaws. Are you not aware of them?
You speak of Adam and Eve matter of factly, as though their existence wasn't entirely fictional. Which is odd.
Our species evolved sir. Catch up!
Originally posted by @bigdoggproblemElaborate on your position on Job, then.
"...purposeful bad take"? Nah, sorry, claim rejected. There's nothing wrong with struggling with a question without a definitive result. That is your assumption, not mine.
Edit: and a guy like you could learn a LOT from South Park. [That is not an insult.]
Originally posted by @philokaliaQuick question. Why did God find it necessary to have his 'wisdom and integrity in running the cosmos vindicated', before Satan?
The book of Job does answer the problem.
Job is tested by a series of evil occurrences, but perserveres through them all, and is then richly rewarded again by God.
And, moreover, this:
[quote]. The most righteous man on the earth was thus chosen to be tested. If Job failed, the narrative suggests, then the satan will have made his point. If he ...[text shortened]... le but it ultimately sputters out: it doesn't have any truly persuasive message or new analysis.
Originally posted by @bigdoggproblemFreewill invariably gets the blame.
The question is, Why do bad things happen to good people?
"Why daddy did our village get wiped out by that plague and cataclysmic earthquake?"
"That was freewill son."