Originally posted by rwingett
Aye, Aye, Cap'n!
Well what else did you expect?
You say "I don't
accept your argument and you don't
accept mine"
The aim is not to just 'accept' peoples arguments, but to evaluate them via reasoning and evidence.
Why should I just agree with you?
Surely you should have to justify your positions, before you should expect anyone to agree they are valid?
I didn't accept your arguments because you never justified them and I could see counter arguments.
If you had produced a well put together argument with supporting evidence that backed you position up
and dealt with my counter points I would have changed my mind.
Instead you simply kept restating your position in more and more hostile tones.
Finally and begrudgingly produced some justification in a most patronising "this is self evident I don't
know why I have to say this" tone.
I immediately poke holes in those justifications using evidence and reason and you just give up.
This is very intellectually dishonest. (and I dislike using that word now given dasa's abuse of it but it fits)
You go onto a forum for debating, pose an interesting argument and position that attracts people willing
and interested to debate it and then proceed to try to preach to them, before finally just giving up when
you find they don't just buy your arguments on spec.
Why should you expect anything else but disappointment and frustration from those you strung along
expecting a debate only to find nothing there?
And why should we pay any attention to you ever again?