21 Dec '05 09:18>
It has occured to me as of late that there is a common statement occuring (with due grounds in my book).
"Religious people should learn about thier religion" or something to this end, also commonly followed by, "they should learn about other religions".
I can certainly appreciate this sentiment, as I myself will admit that there are a vast number of people in this world who love to speak about that which they do not know, and this is never more true than with religion.
The query I pose is this, "Can someone who does not know about religion actually be considered 'religious'." Spiritual, perhaps, but religious?
I know this is, for all intents and purposes, a moot point. However, I thought it funny that, in my own mind, this common sentiment might be more accurately stated as, "People who speak about religion should be bothered to be learn about it first". I suppose this is true of anything really.
Pax Vobiscum,
Omnislash
"Religious people should learn about thier religion" or something to this end, also commonly followed by, "they should learn about other religions".
I can certainly appreciate this sentiment, as I myself will admit that there are a vast number of people in this world who love to speak about that which they do not know, and this is never more true than with religion.
The query I pose is this, "Can someone who does not know about religion actually be considered 'religious'." Spiritual, perhaps, but religious?
I know this is, for all intents and purposes, a moot point. However, I thought it funny that, in my own mind, this common sentiment might be more accurately stated as, "People who speak about religion should be bothered to be learn about it first". I suppose this is true of anything really.
Pax Vobiscum,
Omnislash