Originally posted by robbie carrobie why would I have a system, an evaluation must be made in specific cases, one cannot be dogmatic.
so your definition of 'common' alters from case to case? what evaluation system do you use to figure out which definition to use? are you able to give any solid facts or parameters you use for any system? if not then you are simply guessing.
for example, you define red hair as common. red hair occurs in less than 0.5% of people. i think most would agree this is a very unusual use of the word 'common'.
Originally posted by stellspalfie so your definition of 'common' alters from case to case? what evaluation system do you use to figure out which definition to use? are you able to give any solid facts or parameters you use for any system? if not then you are simply guessing.
for example, you define red hair as common. red hair occurs in less than 0.5% of people. i think most would agree this is a very unusual use of the word 'common'.
it depends and one must go on a case to case basis.
Originally posted by robbie carrobie it depends and one must go on a case to case basis.
ha! this is priceless.
okay lets take it on a case by case. lets take the case of red hair. how does robbie begin to evaluate abnormality in red hair. how do you figure out which parameters to use? take me through the process with each step.
Originally posted by robbie carrobie and so could your friends when they read the text 'you ignorant and bigoted ****' but no, it was not until a perceived slur against gays that their consciences were motivated to act, can you tell us why that should be the case for both are transgressions of the ToS.
How am I supposed to know what someone else thinks?