1 edit
Originally posted by sonshipYou seem to have missed the point of my post which is that the American College of Pediatricians is a disreputable organization as evidenced by its misrepresenting the research of others to further its agenda. This was the organization referred to by the head of the Family Research Council in his attempt to lend credence to his claim that homosexuality poses a danger to children. You've repeatedly cited the Family Research Council in your attempt to claim that homosexuals are more of a danger to children than heterosexuals. Your claim is false.
I want to hear some other staticians' numbers and analysis besides the ones you would refer me to.
Where is your sense of being munipulated with propaganda when in
in 1988, a group of prominent homosexuals got together in Warrentown,
Virginia, to map out their plan to get homosexuality accepted
by the general public ?
[quote] In the book that r ...[text shortened]... ng themselves to one another.
Where is your concern for "a special interest group" then ?
As the American Psychological Association's "Understanding Child Sexual Abuse: Education, Prevention and Recovery" states: "Despite a common myth, homosexual men are not more likely to sexually abuse children than heterosexual men are."
1 edit
Originally posted by ThinkOfOneI say we ask Vladimir Putin,
You seem to have missed the point of my post which is that the American College of Pediatricians is a disreputable organization as evidenced by its misrepresenting the research of others to further its agenda. This was the organization referred to by the head of the Family Research Council in his attempt to lend credence to his claim that homosexuality po ...[text shortened]... myth, homosexual men are not more likely to sexually abuse children than heterosexual men are."
'leave children alone'
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/vladimir-putin/10579951/Putin-says-gay-visitors-to-Sochi-Olympics-must-leave-children-alone.html
Originally posted by robbie carrobieThe only question I'd ask Valddy Putin is whether he'd like me to shoot him in the front or the back of the head.
I say we ask Vladimir Putin,
'leave children alone'
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/vladimir-putin/10579951/Putin-says-gay-visitors-to-Sochi-Olympics-must-leave-children-alone.html
1 edit
Originally posted by Proper KnobNO gay propaganda on the children dude, he is absolutely correct, children need protection from that kind of propaganda. He's my hero now.
The only question I'd ask Valddy Putin is whether he'd like me to shoot him in the front or the back of the head.
2 edits
Originally posted by Proper KnobHe is my hero because,
A man who let's skin head groups go around capturing, torturing and killing gay people is your hero?
We have a ban on the propaganda of homosexuality and paedophilia. I want to emphasise this. Among children. These are completely different things — a ban on something, or a ban on such relationships or a ban on propaganda of such relationships.”
He is protecting the children dude
Does he authorize the capture and killing of Gays, perhaps funding and arming the Russian skinheads? If not then your statement is pure emotionalism.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieHe's scum, that he's your new hero speaks volumes of your character. Maybe you should read this -
He is my hero because,
We have a ban on the propaganda of homosexuality and paedophilia. I want to emphasise this. Among children. These are completely different things — a ban on something, or a ban on such relationships or a ban on propaganda of such relationships.”
He is protecting the children dude
Does he authorize the capture and kil ...[text shortened]... haps funding and arming the Russian skinheads? If not then your statement is pure emotionalism.
https://www.aclu.org/blog/organization-news-and-highlights/russias-bans-jehovahs-witnesses
Originally posted by Proper Knoboh we have been banned many times, in fact the Witness story of Russia is extremely harrowing, brutality, forced labour, Gulags and exile, confiscation of property etc etc he is simply under pressure from the Russian orthodox church because they are so powerful and the people dont like them because their spirituality is empty and ours is awesome, but never the less, his willingness to protect children and ban gay propaganda must be applauded.
He's scum, that he's your new hero speaks volumes of your character. Maybe you should read this -
https://www.aclu.org/blog/organization-news-and-highlights/russias-bans-jehovahs-witnesses
Originally posted by robbie carrobieHe's scum. The sooner he's dead the better.
oh we have been banned many times, in fact the Witness story of Russia is extremely harrowing, brutality, forced labour, Gulags and exile, confiscation of property etc etc he is simply under pressure from the Russian orthodox church because they are so powerful and the people dont like them because their spirituality is empty and ours is awesome, but never the less, his willingness to protect children and ban gay propaganda must be applauded.
1 edit
Originally posted by robbie carrobieWhat a tool you are O'Great Spiritual Eunuch!! The word arse offends your 'moral sensibilities' yet you're happy to proclaim a know human rights abuser as your new 'hero'. I personally couldn't give a hoot if I offend your 'moral sensibilities'. Grow a pair of balls and man up you moral buffet king.
please no swear words, it offends my moral sensibilities.
Originally posted by Proper KnobLOL, too funny 😀
What a tool you are O'Great Spiritual Eunuch!! The word arse offends your 'moral sensibilities' yet you're happy to proclaim a know human rights abuser as your new 'hero'. I personally couldn't give a hoot if I offend your 'moral sensibilities'. Grow a pair of balls and man up you moral buffet king.