@fmf saidI refer to it as behavior because om not actually invoking the comment by itself but referring to a pattern of actions, right...
It isn't "behaviour". It is a question posed after reading sonship's post. Here it is again:
sonship, you have condemned Humanists as merely "eating faeces" and "spreading germs" when they share their ideas. You have compared atheism to "animal excrement". And you've likened people who do not have the same beliefs as you to unclean dogs and pigs and cockroaches. Would you describe the Midianites as vermin?
Someone is just posting regularly, and then you hope to shame them with some past remark. Perhaps the remark is regrettable and accurate, but more often it is exaggerated and decontextualized.
You bring up members from years ago I've never even seen post while doing this.
It's not good, IMO!
@Duchess64
So you and Cassiadr are both in favor of the mass termination of millions of unborn women since Roe V Wade ?
Are you pro-choice to kill them off by the millions ?
That's not genocide?
The post that was quoted here has been removedI believe that the actions were justified, but due to the nature of technology and how we live now, there is never any need to do anything like this.
In the old days, a soldier and a civilian were only distinguished by how they were using their work tools and where they were walking.
Now, technology has progressed to such a point where the category of civilian is absolutely distinct, and loyalties are no longer existent upon tribal lines.
This could even be said to be true, more or less, during the times of Rome.
The post that was quoted here has been removedIf the choice is between the mass murder of your people or the mass murder of another people, it makes sense and is moral to choose your own self preservation.
And that is basically the story of the conquest of Canaan and subsequent wars for the defense of the Hebrews.
The post that was quoted here has been removedObviously, he has a different judgment of when life begins.
What if someone said that you can't grasp the difference between a tiny infant and a human being.
The distinctions that man choose become arbitrarily chosen, and they are based on what men feel is most convenient for them as opposed to divine truth.
@philokalia saidIs that very serious debate helped by the use of the word "genocide" to describe the termination of pregnancies?
Obviously, he has a different judgment of when life begins.