Originally posted by @dj2beckerBecause she is abusive, often incoherent - as if fumbling with rage - she almost invariably refuses to address the content of the post she is replying to, and frequently alludes to her own disgust, contempt and anger.
When then do you think Suzianne is angry?
Originally posted by @dj2beckerYou don't. I thought you were lying about being in a cult. You should call it as you see it. I do.
So you say, how do I know that you are not lying?
Originally posted by @fmfThis is your perception. My perception of most your posts are that they exhibit a strong feeling of annoyance, displeasure, or hostility.
Because she is abusive, often incoherent - as if fumbling with rage - she almost invariably refuses to address the content of the post she is replying to, and frequently alludes to her own disgust, contempt and anger.
Originally posted by @dj2beckerI thought you were lying when we discussed it at length earler this year for the explicit reasons I have you at the time. Now I am inclined to believe you because it seems to have taken a toll on you - as you have admitted - and it has made you rather immature in certain ways - something you have also admitted. I am inclined to believe you now because it does seem to explain a lot as I think I explained earlier on this thread.
Sure. I only belonged to a cult when it suits you. That much is clear.
Originally posted by @dj2beckerDo you also perceive anger in some of Suzianne's posts?
This is your perception. My perception of most your posts are that they exhibit a strong feeling of annoyance, displeasure, or hostility.
Originally posted by @fmfYou 'believe me' when it's convenient for you to use it to your advantage to insult me. Nothing new there.
I thought you were lying when we discussed it at length earler this year for the explicit reasons I have you at the time. Now I am inclined to believe you because it seems to have taken a toll on you - as you have admitted - and it has made you rather immature in certain ways - something you have also admitted. I am inclined to believe you now because it does seem to explain a lot as I think I explained earlier on this thread.
Originally posted by @dj2beckerI believe you because the abuse you described fits the toll you admit it took on you and which you exhibit. Talking to you about the toll it's taken is not an insult. To me something has to be untrue to be insulting.
You 'believe me' when it's convenient for you to use it to your advantage to insult me. Nothing new there.
Originally posted by @fmfPutting words in my mouth and twisting them to suit your agenda is insulting.
I believe you because the abuse you described fits the toll you admit it took on you and which you exhibit. Talking to you about the toll it's taken is not an insult. To me something has to be untrue to be insulting.
Originally posted by @dj2beckerI haven't put any words in your mouth. I have simply described what you have revealed.
Putting words in my mouth and twisting them to suit your agenda is insulting.
Originally posted by @dj2beckerYou either do or you don’t. You haven't said. That's why I am asking again. Do you perceive anger in Suzianne in accordance with the same dictionary definition that you used to say you perceived anger in me?
Go back any read what I told you the last time you asked this.
Originally posted by @dj2beckerYou have acknowledged that the cult experience has taken it's toll on your intellectual and interpersonal behaviour. You acknowledged it. You voluntarily blamed the cult for that toll. More recently you suggested that, having only escaped from the cult at the age of 24, you are in certain ways still like a teenager. Nothing is twisted.
You would have used my words and not your own twisted ones if you were quoting me accurately.