@secondson saidBased on the candid things you have said and your demeanour and behaviour, I think it's possible to know a lot about you - or, at least, what you project and claim in online disinhibition mode. I don't see what rings false. It all has a loud ring of truth about it.
What divegeester says about me is false. He knows nothing about me, my life, my church or anything else about my personal life, yet he attempts to denigrate me by making things up.
@secondson saidHe believes that Jesus died to save him from his "sins" and he strives to live in accordance with Jesus' commandments. This is unaffected by you calling it "a charade". He doesn't have to agree with you over all the doctrine.
Essentially divegeester is you hiding behind a charade of Christianity.
@secondson saidSee my edit sir.
Like the whether? 🙂
(If we were to discuss the weather though it might be in how you choose to spell it).
@fmf saidGood, I see some improvement in your demeanor about Christians.
He believes that Jesus died to save him from his "sins" and he strives to live in accordance with Jesus' commandments. This is unaffected by you calling it "a charade". He doesn't have to agree with you over all the doctrine.
How many times have I seen you goad Christians, asking if some other Christian doesn't agree with a point of doctrine are they still a Christian, etc.?
Glad to see you finally acknowledge that Christians can disagree on points of doctrine.
@suzianne saidIt's a debate and discussion forum and I am interested in how groupism and partisanship so often trump principle or integrity regarding beliefs. I don't "goad" anyone.
How many times have I seen you goad Christians, asking if some other Christian doesn't agree with a point of doctrine are they still a Christian, etc.?