Originally posted by googlefudgeYou sound like a computer. If I just post, then I won't be able to reply properly to your post.
Try just posting an answer there is no need to put a place marker in.
I am aware I haven't died, I imagine I will be the first to know when it happens 😛 .
When I die there will be nothing, not I will sit there and nothing will happen, but that I wont exist, my brain will die and the data stored in it will be lost (unless of course I do something about ...[text shortened]... nce; there is no soul, no afterlife, just nothing. Which is why I would quite like to avoid it.
- Joined
- 31 May 06
- Moves
- 1795
Originally posted by royaltystatementtake your time, we can cope if your response doesn't imediatly follow the post it refers to, thats what the 'include previouse post' option is for.
You sound like a computer. If I just post, then I won't be able to reply properly to your post.
- Joined
- 31 May 06
- Moves
- 1795
Originally posted by royaltystatementI didn't say thats what I wanted to happen, Just what would happen if no action was taken on my part before hand to prevent this occuring, if at all possible I would like to not die, ever. If I fail in this however then when I die I will simply cease to exist, as will you and everyone else.
So, the data in you mind is lost when you die huh!? Well, if that's the end you want for yourself, let it be so.😕
Originally posted by royaltystatementThat is really retarded, RS. You're confusing what a person thinks actually IS with what that person WANTS to be. Why are you ignoring common sense like that?
So, the data in you mind is lost when you die huh!? Well, if that's the end you want for yourself, let it be so.😕
Please, think carefully about your motives and reasoning before responding.
1) Satan exists because God created him (Lucifer the angel if you'll recall)
2) God wins in the end (read the book of Revelation)
3) Satan is ruler of this world: Earth (it's in the Bible)
4) God still wins in the end (See above ref. for Revelation)
SO THERE YOU HAVE IT, BELIEVERS AND NON-BELIVERS ALIKE.
YOU HAVE TWO, AND ONLY TWO, PATHS TO CHOOSE.
WHICH ONE WILL YOU CHOOSE?🙄
- Joined
- 10 Jun 03
- Moves
- 19229
I haven't read all the posts, but one must remember evolution and creationism are both theories of origins. The data that exists today, exists in the present and can only be conjectured since past events cannot be accurately recreated. Neither theory is testable by the scientific method, so neither side lay claim to their view as being scientific. I find that it is the evolutionist who boasts that they are doing science; that is utter nonsense, why? Because they have developed a theory and claimed it to be science based on unobservable and unrepeatable events. That is not science, that is speculation. Science demands observable and repeatable testing, that is the scientific method. When the spark machine was developed it was claimed that man could create life; however, one must remember the primary mechanism behind evolution is blind chance governed by random processes over vast eons of time. But when the spark machine is used to create life a new element is added that wasn't present in the beginning, intelligence; creation guided by an intelligent designer. Now you have Intelligent Design, thus establishing the creationist position as factual.
Originally posted by LangtreeYou should have read the thread. You would have found person after person coming into the thread stating what you are stating and being shown to be wrong before slinking away to be replaced by yet another idiot.
I haven't read all the posts, but one must remember evolution and creationism are both theories of origins. The data that exists today, exists in the present and can only be conjectured since past events cannot be accurately recreated. Neither theory is testable by the scientific method, so neither side lay claim to their view as being scientific. I find ...[text shortened]... gner. Now you have Intelligent Design, thus establishing the creationist position as factual.