Go back
Why Are Things Believed ?

Why Are Things Believed ?

Spirituality

1 edit

@kellyjay said
I guess rising from the dead doesn't mean what it used to.
Whatever the supposed rising from the dead "means" to you or how it makes you feel, this meaning and feeling do not turn it into a "historical truth".

Religious faith rooted in supernatural causality pertains to things you cannot demonstrate to be true: this is the very essence of what "faith" is.

Your claim that it is "the truth" is exactly that: a claim.

1 edit

@fmf said
Whatever the supposed rising from the dead "means" to you or how it makes you feel, this meaning and feeling do not turn it into a "historical truth".

Religious faith rooted in supernatural causality pertains to things you cannot demonstrate to be true: this is the very essence of what "faith" is.

Your claim that it is "the truth" is exactly that: a claim.
So what if it is? How would that be any of your damn business?

Wouldn't you agree that you are expressing bigotry in action by trying to demolish or undermine someone else's worldview in favor of your own?

And if you were to "win" the discussion, what exactly would be the benefit(s) of that result?

Are you here to play chess or to kick the spiritual supports out from under other people?



@fmf said
Whatever the supposed rising from the dead "means" to you or how it makes you feel, this meaning and feeling do not turn it into a "historical truth".

Religious faith rooted in supernatural causality pertains to things you cannot demonstrate to be true: this is the very essence of what "faith" is.

Your claim that it is "the truth" is exactly that: a claim.
People make claims all of the time; some claim the universe is billions of years old,
others different times, some claim life sprang up from dead dirt or no living material
without anything but random chance, some claim they are married to someone
else, some claim they know who their mom and dad are, the earth is full of people
making claims.

Some claims bring about change; others hinder them, some bring hate, others
love, the truth is found as you examine the results, the details, simply saying I
don't believe no matter what is said is not examining a claim, it is defining the
possibly out of existence by definition only; you simply don't want it to be true
so it isn't.


@kellyjay said
People make claims all of the time; some claim the universe is billions of years old,
others different times, some claim life sprang up from dead dirt or no living material
without anything but random chance, some claim they are married to someone
else, some claim they know who their mom and dad are, the earth is full of people
making claims.

Some claims bring about c ...[text shortened]... the
possibly out of existence by definition only; you simply don't want it to be true
so it isn't.
Yes, KellyJay, the world is full of people making claims.


@kellyjay said
simply saying I
don't believe no matter what is said is not examining a claim, it is defining the
possibly out of existence by definition only; you simply don't want it to be true
so it isn't.
You should track someone down who is "not examining the claims" you make and talk to them about it.

I think Christianity is well worth examining. I had many very good years as a Christian.

If you manage to engage someone here who is "not examining the claims" you make, then I will watch with interest.


-Removed-
That is not necessarily a bad thing.

3 edits


@fmf said
Yes, KellyJay, the world is full of people making claims.
And some are true, others not; the fact that claims are made only shows that we
are proclaiming what we think is true or right, or what we want to think is true or
right. The validity of the claims denied or embraced stands on their own being
true or not.


@kellyjay said
And some are true, others not; the fact that claims are made only shows that we
are proclaiming what we think is true or right, or what we want to think is true or
right. The validity of the claims denied or embraced stands on their own being
true or not.
And in matters pertaining to the supernatural, the "validity of the claims denied or embraced" all falls within the realm of subjectivity.

2 edits

@fmf said
And in matters pertaining to the supernatural, the "validity of the claims denied or embraced" all falls within the realm of subjectivity.
You all can do is make such a claim as if it's true while proclaiming all matters of the
supernatural are only subjective. You assume you know enough to deny all matters
supernatural, which means you think you do know that as objective truth, so your
statement is nothing but a contradiction.


@kellyjay said
You assume you know enough to deny all matters
supernatural, which means you think you do know that as objective truth, so your
statement is nothing but a contradiction.
First of all, I don't "deny all matters supernatural". Don't be so disingenuous. I started a whole thread to divest you of this silly strawman. Now here you are pretending you haven't read it.

Second of all, I do not claim my perspective is "objective". Don't be so disingenuous. Have you not read any of my posts for the last 15 years?


@kellyjay said
You all can do is make such a claim as if it's true while proclaiming all matters of thesupernatural are only subjective.
Your perspectives on "matters of the supernatural" and my perspectives on "matters of the supernatural", are both subjective. I must have made this clear to you 200 times. Why are pretending otherwise?

1 edit

@kellyjay said
You all can do is make such a claim as if it's true while proclaiming all matters of the
supernatural are only subjective. You assume you know enough to deny all matters
supernatural, which means you think you do know that as objective truth, so your
statement is nothing but a contradiction.
You assume you know enough to deny all matters supernatural

Thread 193786

Thread 193783 page 1


@fmf said
Your perspectives on "matters of the supernatural" and my perspectives on "matters of the supernatural", are both subjective. I must have made this clear to you 200 times. Why are pretending otherwise?
Then it would help if you said, "I believe they are subjective," your use of language
isn't one of subjectivity; you should at least mean what you say as you say it.