Genesis 3:15
And I will put enmity between you and the woman, and between your offspring and hers; he will crush your head, and you will strike his heel.”
Deuteronomy 18:15
The Lord your God will raise up for you a prophet like me from among you, from your fellow Israelites. You must listen to him.
Romans 4:3
What does Scripture say? "Abraham believed God, and it was credited to him as righteousness."
Originally posted by RBHILLI remember being taught in school the Aztecs believed Cortez was a savior God from one of their legends. I wonder if something was passed down from Noah that they still remembered about a savior God to come just like all those flood myths or legends. If so, they were not warned about the anti-Christ was coming first, which Cortez and his men turned out to be for them.
They new of a coming savior.
1 edit
-Removed-Its not important to the arguments being proffered who the evangelics actually are, does it make any difference to the arguments if its pointed out that John MaCain is a republican and also an evangelical Christian or that the groups are essentially protestant denominations, no, its a nonsense to say that it has any relevance to the arguments being proffered because they are not dependent on who it is but what they are doing, to what extent and why. Similarly when one has a so called point of reference it tends to act like a hook for prejudices, he's a republican, he's a socialist and hey it provides a convenient point to hang ones prejudices upon. Does it matter that David Cameron is a Tory if he's writing a column on stamp collecting, hardly. So I reject the notion entirely of a so called point of reference, for its also irrelevant to the points being proffered which should be judged objectively and independently on their merits alone.
Whether the article is poorly written is an irrelevancy to the points that it makes, those being that evangelical Christians have made a caricature of the Christ.
Whether i like it or not is also irrelevant to the points that the article was making, you may do better if you learn to actually address the points that are actually contained within the articles that are cited rather than those which are not and are irrelevant to that actual content.
I thank Ckeckbaiter and others who actually did acknowledge the content of the article and tried at very least to find some Biblical justification for the stance that evangelicals have taken, even Ronald Jonah My Behinds managed to do it, albeit it not very successfully. Perhaps you could too.
1 edit
-Removed-the articles does not mention specific evangelicals, evangelism is a movement comprising of essentially protestant churches and I have demonstrated throughout this thread, with Biblical reference, why such a caricature as is alleged in the article has created a disparity which has not only superseded the Biblical Christ, but made him unrecognisable..