30 Jan 17
Originally posted by sonshipSir, if you didn't over do it, it wouldn't be a sonship reply.
No.
God has spoken to us in the Bible.
We need that very much.
And God still speaks to us when His living Spirit enlightens to the heart the words of the Bible. This is called the [b]rhema or the word. The previous is called the logos.
No, Ghost, I would rather let the word of God erase in me those sins, transgressions, iniquitie ...[text shortened]... s of the fallen Adamic humanity.
Did this answer your question?
Did it over do it ?
Good.[/b]
The bible is so full of embarrassing contradictions and acts of divine monstrosity that I thought you might rather like to re-write it and take all that unpalatable stuff out. You could even put some stuff in about the trinity.
- Joined
- 03 Jan 13
- Moves
- 13080
30 Jan 17
Originally posted by Ghost of a DukeSir, if you didn't over do it, it wouldn't be a sonship reply.
Sir, if you didn't over do it, it wouldn't be a sonship reply.
The bible is so full of embarrassing contradictions and acts of divine monstrosity that I thought you might rather like to re-write it and take all that unpalatable stuff out. You could even put some stuff in about the trinity.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
a genuine lol
The bible is so full of embarrassing contradictions and acts of divine monstrosity that I thought you might rather like to re-write it and take all that unpalatable stuff out. You could even put some stuff in about the trinity.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Check new thread on "Back to Contradictions"
Stay with me for awhile now on this.
Don't slip off because I start the thread for YOU.
30 Jan 17
Originally posted by josephwRead the entirety of what I wrote about you:
[b]"The fact is the Bible is widely open to interpretation because it is a metaphorical and esoteric work that contains inconsistencies, discrepancies and outright contradictions."
The real fact is that it is man that "contains inconsistencies, discrepancies and outright contradictions."
You believe a lie. When you disparage God's Word in such a w ...[text shortened]... ithering mouthpiece, I have never done any such thing. Prove otherwise or shut your lying mouth.[/b]
"Josephw is a conservative. He believes in conservative causes and its politics. He has attempted to justify and reconcile his conservative political agenda with his so-called Christian beliefs without regard for the clear teachings of the scriptures."
Now read what you wrote about Suzianne:
"Suzianne is a liberal. She believes in liberal causes and its politics. She has attempted to justify and reconcile her liberal political agenda with her so-called Christian beliefs without regard for the clear teachings of the scriptures."
I simply echoed back to you, what you wrote about her. If each of you were to make your best case, I'd put my money on Suzianne.
The reason that such widely differing views can both be based on the Bible was explained as follows:
"The fact is the Bible is widely open to interpretation because it is a metaphorical and esoteric work that contains inconsistencies, discrepancies and outright contradictions. It is what it is. As such, people end up choosing verses and passages that support their beliefs and end up dismissing those that don't. If you can be honest with yourself, you know that this is true."
You believe a lie. When you disparage God's Word in such a way you are calling God a liar, and because you don't realize that's what you're doing tells me you're void of The Truth.
Actually I believe that you are unable to be honest with yourself.
31 Jan 17
Originally posted by ThinkOfOne"Actually I believe that you are unable to be honest with yourself."
Read the entirety of what I wrote about you:
"Josephw is a conservative. He believes in conservative causes and its politics. He has attempted to justify and reconcile his conservative political agenda with his so-called Christian beliefs without regard for the clear teachings of the scriptures."
Now read what you wrote about Suzianne:
"Suzianne is a ...[text shortened]... 're void of The Truth.
Actually I believe that you are unable to be honest with yourself.[/b]
And YOU are just unable to be honest.
31 Jan 17
Originally posted by josephwThe fact is the Bible is widely open to interpretation because it is a metaphorical and esoteric work that contains inconsistencies, discrepancies and outright contradictions. It is what it is. As such, people end up choosing verses and passages that support their beliefs and end up dismissing those that don't. If you can be honest with yourself, you know that this is true
[b]"Actually I believe that you are unable to be honest with yourself."
And YOU are just unable to be honest.[/b]
31 Jan 17
Originally posted by ThinkOfOneI think what you are saying speaks more about you than the Bible.
The fact is the Bible is widely open to interpretation because it is a metaphorical and esoteric work that contains inconsistencies, discrepancies and outright contradictions. It is what it is. As such, people end up choosing verses and passages that support their beliefs and end up dismissing those that don't. If you can be honest with yourself, you know that this is true