01 May 18
Originally posted by @dj2beckerWhy are you asking me this again? You already know what my answer is.
Do you also enjoy dodging questions and pretending to have answered them before? What is up with that?
Originally posted by @dj2beckerBut I don't have to prove anything to you or to anyone else by quoting anyone - not you, not me. Once I've told you I am not interested in answering your question for the specific reason I give - whether you agree with that reason or not ~ that should be the end of that. Just say you think I am lying and then move on to something new. But you just ignore what I have said, the reason I have given, and ask the question again. And again. And again. I came to the conclusion it's a gimmick. Like now, for example. Here you are doing it again.
Case in point. Unless of course you can quote me previously where I asked you this question which we both know you can't.
Originally posted by @romans1009What is that you think you "dish out" that I cannot take?
My honest opinion is you and a few other posters love to dish it out but can’t take it.
01 May 18
Originally posted by @fmf😴
But I don't have to prove anything to you or to anyone else by quoting anyone - not you, not me. Once I've told you I am not interested in answering your question for the specific reason I give - whether you agree with that reason or not ~ that should be the end of that. Just say you think I am lying and then move on to something new. But you just ignore what I ...[text shortened]... in. I came to the conclusion it's a gimmick. Like now, for example. Here you are doing it again.
Originally posted by @divegeesterYou just got through saying you’re “pretty much done” with me and here you are less than an hour later. You just can’t quit me.
What is that you think you "dish out" that I cannot take?
Originally posted by @divegeesterYour own medicine.
What is that you think you "dish out" that I cannot take?
Edit: BTW, I dig the new avatar.
Originally posted by @dj2beckerSo then, you admit - it seems - to hearing this - my stance - before, so often in fact, that you reply with a yawn symbol. So you now know what my stance is. And you are conceding that you have heard it before, to the point it bores you. So why did you ask me about it again? Anyway. We are making progress. You will note that every time you have said to me that you decline to answer a question because you feel you have already answered it, and don't feel the need to repeat your answer, I have accepted this and moved on. You should quite simply return the common courtesy.
😴
Originally posted by @romans1009What medicine?
Your own medicine.
You sound like sonship, all prickly and defensive.
01 May 18
Originally posted by @fmfThe yawn symbol is for your trolling. Obviously you don't have to prove anything if you're just trolling.
So then, you admit - it seems - to hearing this - my stance - before, so often in fact, that you reply with a yawn symbol. So you now know what my stance is. And you are conceding that you have heard it before, to the point it bores you. So why did you ask me about it again? Anyway. We are making progress. You will note that every time you have said to me that ...[text shortened]... r answer, I have accepted this and moved on. You should quite simply return the common courtesy.
Originally posted by @dj2beckerIf I decline to answer a question of yours because I believe that you have asked me before and I believe you are just ignoring the previous answer, then the question is declined. And I don't have to prove anything. That's that.
The yawn symbol is for your trolling. Obviously you don't have to prove anything if you're just trolling.
You asked a question - I perceived it to be the gimmick I've told you about [you can disagree all you want] - and you did not get me to answer it. And so that's that.
There is no onus on me to prove anything. Just as, when you have said the same thing to me about one of my questions, I have never asked you to prove to me that you did, in fact, answer it. I asked a question. You declined, saying your stance had not changed. I accepted that. And we moved on.
01 May 18
Originally posted by @divegeesterI’m not prickly or defensive at all. I just think it’s hilarious that less than an hour after you tried to break up with me, you’re strumming a guitar and singing outside my window.
What medicine?
You sound like sonship, all prickly and defensive.
01 May 18
Originally posted by @fmfIf you are trolling there is no onus on you to prove anything because you obviously can't.
If I decline to answer a question of yours because I believe that you have asked me before and I believe you are just ignoring the previous answer, then the question is declined. And I don't have to prove anything. That's that.
You asked a question - I perceived it to be the gimmick I've told you about [you can disagree all you want] - and you did not get ...[text shortened]... a question. You declined, saying your stance had not changed. I accepted that. And we moved on.
Originally posted by @fmfYou could write a 1,000-word post about a dust ball.
If I decline to answer a question of yours because I believe that you have asked me before and I believe you are just ignoring the previous answer, then the question is declined. And I don't have to prove anything. That's that.
You asked a question - I perceived it to be the gimmick I've told you about [you can disagree all you want] - and you did not get ...[text shortened]... a question. You declined, saying your stance had not changed. I accepted that. And we moved on.
Originally posted by @dj2beckerYou can call it trolling if you want. But if I decline to answer a question, and give you my reason, regardless of whether or not you are satisfied with that reason, the question is declined. And you know why. There is no onus on me to prove anything with regard to my reason for declining to answer, regardless of whether the exchange is trolling or not trolling.
If you are trolling there is no onus on you to prove anything because you obviously can't.