Originally posted by RJHinds
I thought he would keep his word and be fair. I am still not sure what he
means by idiotic engine use.

It means there are those that use engines and go undetected then there is you.

Originally posted by RJHinds
I thought he would keep his word and be fair.

You said you would accept Zygalski's verdict and then you decided not to when it didn't suit you. Is that not lacking in integrity on your part?

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
My kid is plagued with nightmares at present, something deep in his subconscious is clearly disturbing him 🙁

I will light an incense stick and say a little prayer for him 🙂

All the best ,little tacker 🙂

Originally posted by RJHinds
With the total average % for those games I would have a matchup grade of D,
if these had been on tests of school papers. Proper Knob was not statisfied with
that, but wanted to accuse me of cheating so bad that he listed what he called
the the 2nd and 3rd best choices and the other guy even added the 4th best
choice. I told them that was like having a eat
Deep Blue in their first match.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deep_Blue_(chess_computer)

Here's analysis of Magnus Carlsen's games, 20 of them -

Analysis "Rybka 2.2n2 32-bit Hash:128 Time:30s Depth:12-16ply"

{ Magnus Carlsen (Games: 20) }
{ Top 1 Match: 484/842 ( 57.5% ) Opponents: 457/837 ( 54.6% )
{ Top 2 Match: 628/842 ( 74.6% ) Opponents: 599/837 ( 71.6% )
{ Top 3 Match: 698/842 ( 82.9% ) Opponents: 673/837 ( 80.4% )
{ Top 4 Match: 733/842 ( 87.1% ) Opponents: 720/837 ( 86.0% )


Here's yours -

RJHinds (Games: 20)
Top 1 Match: 510/767 ( 66.5% )
Top 2 Match: 645/767 ( 84.1% )
Top 3 Match: 704/767 ( 91.8% )
Top 4 Match: 728/767 ( 94.9% )

and here's a 20 game analysis of gambit05 which i did, gambit05 is rated 2200+ on RHP -

gambit05 (Games: 20)
Top 1 match: 318/642 ( 49.5% )
Top 2 match: 455/642 ( 70.9% )
Top 3 match: 537/642 ( 83.6% )

and here's a 10 game analysis of GM Viacheslav Ragozin winning the 2nd ICCF World Championship in 1959 -

Ragozin (Games: 10)
Top 1 Match: 170/284 ( 59.8% )
Top 2 Match: 220/284 ( 77.4% )
Top 3 Match: 246/284 ( 86.6% )
Top 4 Match: 261/284 ( 91.9% )

You have considerably higher matchup rates than everyone. How come you have higher matchup rates than an OTB Grandmaster winning the ICCF world championship?

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
My kid is plagued with nightmares at present, something deep in his subconscious is clearly disturbing him 🙁

Don't tempt me...

Originally posted by RJHinds
I thought he would keep his word and be fair. I am still not sure what he
means by idiotic engine use.

You give +5% headroom for each of the extreme upper limit thresholds of human achievable engine-like play in many games over time.

I would say that someone playing engine-like chess in non-database positions averaging around
top 1 match = 65%
top 2 match = 80%
top 3 match = 90%
is probably referring to an engine pretty much constantly from when the game goes out of book until it finishes, at least as far as blunderchecking is concerned.

They will rarely (if ever) drop more than 0.25 of a pawn on a single move in any sample game if the ply-by-ply output is studied.
By comparison it's quite interesting how often say Kasparov or Kramnik will drop 0.25 or more of a pawn in a single game...

In other words, they ain't exactly being subtle about it. Hence the word "idiot".

Originally posted by karoly aczel
I will light an incense stick and say a little prayer for him 🙂

All the best ,little tacker 🙂

thanks, i think he gets stressed out at school.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
i think he gets stressed out at school.

So not about being born into a cult then. You don't think he's at all worried about having no way out without being disowned by his parents and having to live with the emotional stress of having walked away?

Originally posted by usmc7257
He said on another forum (after being proved a cheat) that he would leave if another RHP member told him to. The member he spoke of basically declared him a cheat. RJ said that he would leave this site, but one thing held him back... his contributions to this forum.

So I ask: What does RJH contribute to this forum?

I understand the entertainment valu ...[text shortened]... tribute to this forum RJ? I'm off to bed. I'll check back tomorrow for your insightful answer

Because people keep answering his posts, probably for the same reason people pick at old scabs.

Originally posted by divegeester
So not about being born into a cult then. You don't think he's at all worried about having no way out without being disowned by his parents and having to live with the emotional stress of having walked away?

i would say hes more worried about being a plastic Christian with no public ministry, a
fraud that says hes going to heaven to be with Jesus in heaven yet cannot say what
he's going to be doing there, Id stick to talking big and loud and putting the boot in if I
were you and let those people that know the details of a situation find solutions.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
i would say hes more worried about being a plastic Christian with no public ministry, a
fraud that says hes going to heaven to be with Jesus in heaven yet cannot say what
he's going to be doing there, Id stick to talking big and loud and putting the boot in if I
were you and let those people that know the details of a situation find solutions.

I was talking about your child's potential experience of being brought up in a social environment centred around a religious cult, not about me or your thoughts about my spirituality.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
thanks, i think he gets stressed out at school.

Maybe RC your son has somehow manifested the stress born by the guilt of RJHinds idiotic rampant engine use (as RJHinds is somehow impervious to the guilt he should feel for being a lying, cheating SOB) does your son get stressed when others around him have erred in their ways?

Originally posted by Proper Knob
Here's analysis of Magnus Carlsen's games, 20 of them -

Analysis "Rybka 2.2n2 32-bit Hash:128 Time:30s Depth:12-16ply"

{ Magnus Carlsen (Games: 20) }
{ Top 1 Match: 484/842 ( 57.5% ) Opponents: 457/837 ( 54.6% )
{ Top 2 Match: 628/842 ( 74.6% ) Opponents: 599/837 ( 71.6% )
{ Top 3 Match: 698/842 ( 82.9% ) Opponents: 673/837 ( 80.4% )
{ Top ou have higher matchup rates than an OTB Grandmaster winning the ICCF world championship?

Why do some of the other people I play against have engine matchup rates
higher than me? The answer I think is that we are not under any pressure.
We do not have strick rules to comply with like OTB players do. We are allowed
to consult Chess literature, consisting of Openings, middle game, and end game
studies. We can look at past games of masters and grandmasters who have
played the same opening. But most important of all we have the advantage
over a Magnus Calsen or a Kasparov of being able to use an analyze board to
try out our strategies of attack and defense that may go many moves deep into
a positon and study in depth each positon in the plan before making the actual
move. It is clear to me that Magnus Carlsen or Kasparov, with their abilites,
would easily be able to draw or beat any of the people on this site and probably
any computer you have if given RHP rules rather than OTB rules. I dare anyone
prove me wrong.

P.S. It is by the grace of the Lord Jesus that I am still here as a benefit for some
on this forum. Many of you need spiritual help badly. And I have also been
given the honor of helping Christ divide the Wheat from the Chaff.

Originally posted by Zygalski
You give +5% headroom for each of the extreme upper limit thresholds of human achievable engine-like play in many games over time.

I would say that someone playing engine-like chess in non-database positions averaging around
top 1 match = 65%
top 2 match = 80%
top 3 match = 90%
is probably referring to an engine pretty much constantly from when the g ...[text shortened]... ame...

In other words, they ain't exactly being subtle about it. Hence the word "idiot".

Do you really think you are being fair to single me out as being an idiotic chess
engine user, when kingshill the number 1 chess player believes that if I am a
chess engine user that he also qualifies as a chess engine user since he had
higher matchup rates than me? There were also other people I played with
higher matchup rates.

Originally posted by RJHinds
It is by the grace of the Lord Jesus that I am still here as a benefit for some
on this forum.

The reason you are "still here" is surely because you do not feel it necessary to leave having been exposed as a cheat.