FMF,
Still waiting for you to take a position one way or the other.
A. The Christian church has been involved in NO corruption, ever in history?
B. The Christian church has been involved in SOME corruption in history from which Christians should come OUT of ?
Time for you to take a position, since you want to hold me to talking about Satanic organization and such juicy things.
TAKE A POSITION! WHICH?
Still waiting for you to take a position one way or the other.
A. The Christian church has been involved in NO corruption, ever in history?
B. The Christian church has been involved in SOME corruption in history from which Christians should come OUT of ?
Time for you to take a position, since you want to hold me to talking about Satanic organization and such juicy things.
TAKE A POSITION! WHICH?
Time for FMF to take a position. You cannot reach for whatever is handy at the time, depending.
Has the church been involved in corruption ever or it has never been so ?
Are you hesitating to answer? Why are you hesitating to answer with a position on this?
Divegeester, here's the website you like to brandish in your accusations.
The Belief and Practices of the Local Churches
https://www.localchurches.org/beliefs/
Look under - Our Beliefs . Where there does it say we worship someone other than God?
Look under - Our Standing. Where does it exalt Witness Lee to sainthood and veneration there?
Check under Our Mission
Check under Our Hope
Check under Concerning the Recovery
Any indication of mandatory veneration of some servant of God like Witness Lee there? QUOTE IT for us.
Check now under Concerning Salvation.
Examine please Concerning the Christian Life
Check Concerning the Church Life
WHERE ARE THE CLEAR INSTRUCTIONS THAT WITNESS LEE IS TO BE VENERATED ?
I don't see it. Show it to me if you know that's what I'm required to practice - veneration of Witness Lee.
@sonship saidSo, all Christians - apart from those who are members of your group - are members of "Satanic" organisations, right? And this belief of yours is because there has been "some corruption" and not because of Witness Lee's writing? Is that your position now?
FMF,
Still waiting for you to take a position one way or the other.
A. The Christian church has been involved in NO corruption, ever in history?
B. The Christian church has been involved in SOME corruption in history from which Christians should come OUT of ?
Time for you to take a position, since you want to hold me to talking about Satanic organization and such juicy things.
TAKE A POSITION! WHICH?
@sonship saidThe "Satanic" thing that all Christians are members of is because they don't follow Witness Lee AND there has been "some corruption"? Or, are you now saying it's not about doctrine and theology? It's just about "some corruption", right?
[quote] Still waiting for you to take a position one way or the other.
A. The Christian church has been involved in NO corruption, ever in history?
B. The Christian church has been involved in SOME corruption in history from which Christians should come OUT of ?
Time for you to take a position, since you want to hold me to talking about Satanic organizati ...[text shortened]... en so ?
Are you hesitating to answer? Why are you hesitating to answer with a position on this?
@FMF
FMF, I am humoring you now with an exchange of discussion.
I don't want a question from you now.
I didn't even read to the end of your question.
I don't want your questionmark now.
I want you to take a position one way or the other.
I don't want you to hedge on the fence to go EITHER way to maximize your chances of winning an argument.
Give me your position without a question mark.
Or forget it.
@sonship saidHa, you've got some cheek. I've just had 5-6 pages of you dodging and deflecting. "Some corruption" or more than "some corruption" or whatever, the assertion that almost all Christians are members of "Satanic" organisations is surely one of the most virulently and poisonously anti-Christian - and profoundly cultish - things that anyone has ever said on this forum.
@FMF
FMF, I am humoring you now with an exchange of discussion.
I don't want a question from you now.
I didn't even read to the end of your question.
I don't want your questionmark now.
I want you to take a position one way or the other.
I don't want you to hedge on the fence to go EITHER way to maximize your chances of winning an argument.
Give me your position without a question mark.
Or forget it.
A. The Christian church has been involved in NO corruption, ever in history?
B. The Christian church has been involved in SOME corruption in history from which Christians should come OUT of ?
Was that A. or was that B. ?
If it was neither then, good day.
Not chatting with you then.
I have better things to do today.
You don't need to know anything else or need further clarification.
You just need to pick a position.
@sonship saidSo, I take it that your stance has now mutated to this: when the "rapture" comes, all followers of Jesus who are not members of your cult will need to run out and buy books written by Witness Lee because in them he talks - not about the doctrines and theology of Catholicism and Protestantism - but instead about the "some corruption" that has turned all thoses hundreds and hundreds of millions of Christians into members of "Satanic" organisations.
@FMFA. The Christian church has been involved in NO corruption, ever in history?
B. The Christian church has been involved in SOME corruption in history from which Christians should come OUT of ?
Was that A. or was that B. ?
If it was neither then, good day.
Not chatting with you then.
I have better things to do t ...[text shortened]... u don't need to know anything else or need further clarification.
You just need to pick a position.