it’s what you do, not what is written.
I think your' problem is not with Witness Lee or me. I think your problem is with Christ. You speak of "your version of Jesus" or some such talk.
Its the New Testament's Jesus Christ that you have your objections to. And the fact that you rarely mention mentors, or examples of spiritual people from whom you have derived guidance is turned on its head to fake "free-thought" and individualism.
I'm not impressed I think you should stop deflecting to blame faithful servants of Christ by deflecting your misaimed resentment of the Bible's Christ.
You are just misaiming your Unitarian revolt against Christ as disguised blame against faithful servants of Christ like Witness Lee.
You should remember ... WWWLD
"What would Witness Lee Do?"
Maybe in all your days of your hopping around from Unitarian group to Unitarian group you have never had a mentor or shepherding teacher. So being so "free" you're stunted in any spiritual growth and suspicious of anyone to whom you might derive some help.
Do you think I'm impressed with such individualism so as to fall for your leader veneration facade of your isolationism? I don't know why you're annoyed because some Christians in the earth have been well taken care of by a solid supporting ministry showing us a practical way into the kingdom of God.
Instead of WWWLD sarcasm repent of your own wishy washy Unitarian lukewarmness towards the Gospel crusading against the Christ of the New Testament.
Folks you have to feel sorrow somewhat for this orphan Divegeester.
No one ever took care of him in spiritual guidance either in decent teaching or in furnishing practical examples of Christian purpose or living.
So he wanders isolated from congregation to congregation of Unitarians perhaps, always careful not to get too attached or too much of anyone's "follower".
All that isolation and individualized suspicion is brought here to dress up his not wanting the New Testament Jesus Christ to accusing others well served as "venerating" leaders.
Phony "tolerance".
Phony "free thinking."
Phony "cult awareness".
Another trick the Atheist / Unitarian coalition uses:
Chat instead of in-depth analysis.
You see it is always easier to pen off a few negative words chat style. If you go into some more careful analysis of the problem you get this:
"That is too long."
"I got bored reading."
"Oh, that is waffle, too much to read."
"Oh, you need to go start a blog."
You see all this "short attention span" crap is just designed to keep the upper hand with little one or two line cracks, pseudo "wisdom," and skeptical few words meant to impress the gullible.
"Answer me in twenty five words of less like the way the Forum works."
They fortify themselves against any more careful analysis of their complaints in favor of stupid one-upsmanship of little chatty criticisms.
Blimey.
You don't need to go too far for an example.
Oh, the irony.
Take a look at your deflecting banter and sidestepping these last 10 pages or so.
Here's another trick. When you have been answered once in the past accuse repetition of the charges as being subject to sidestepping.
Somebody go get for me a cut and paste where buying books by Witness Lee is:
1.) proof of being saved
2.) proof one is a good Christian
3.) mandatory after the rapture
I simply wrote at one time that underappreciated ministry from this faithful servant of God will be more appreciated someday. And that particularly when walking in the Spirit is vindicated by the sudden disappearance of myriads of Christians who LEARNED the importance of walking in touch with Christ.
Get ready now. Here it comes.
"Oh, sonship are you walking in the Spirit now ? I mean everyone who walks in this Spirit has to be always nice to ME you know? "