03 Jul '12 00:53>
Originally posted by galveston75Why are you making the same argument over and over again despite that argument being
http://necrometrics.com/20c5m.htm
Perhaps many of you have never seen a list like this and the scope of the numbers tha thave died just in the 20th century.
Go slow and be patient as it is many pages long.
So we have progressed in the last 100 years? I don't think so.......
rebutted without ever addressing the rebuttal?
Yes we have seen the friking statistics.
Yes that's a lot of dead people.
However as that website says "...That means that the 203 million multicides I've counted in
the 20th Century would account for 3.7% of all deaths, or 1 out of every 27..."
Which is an awful lot lower proportionately than in the past when the number of people who
died from such things was much higher as a proportion of society and thus any individuals
chance of becoming one of those statistics was much higher.
You are still making the argument that a society where you have a 50% chance of being murdered,
killed in wars, or die in a plague or famine, in any given year is BETTER than a society where you have
a 5% chance of the same IF the society with the 50% death rate is smaller and thus has on overall
lower death rate.
Which is insane.
In the above scenario the society with the 5% death rate is TEN TIMES safer to live in.
The fact that if the society is more than ten times the size of the 50% death rate society it will have a higher
overall death rate doesn't change the fact that it is still TEN TIMES safer.
If I go up to London tomorrow and wander around the city doing my shopping I am vastly less likely to get
mugged/robbed while doing so, and vastly less likely to get killed while doing so, than I would be were I to
try to do the same in Victorian London [say 1850]. (or any earlier period of history)
My expected lifespan (along with everyone else's on the planet) is longer now than at any point in the past
due mainly to the improvements in medicine and the fact that I am much less likely to get murdered or killed
in war than in the past.
Life is generally better now than in the past.
It's better because more knowledge and better technology have allowed us to make it so.
It's not perfect by any means, which is why we are continuing to make improvements and research better technology
and medicine. (as well as social and political efforts).
Now you can mindlessly quote statistics about how many people have died until you are blue in the face.
But that argument that basically everyone bar you and robbie have made and accept obliterates your present argument.
And simply repeating your argument will not change that.
IF you want to convince anyone who doesn't already agree with you that you are right then you MUST address the
counter arguments to your position.
You need to come up with a convincing argument for why we should view a society that is safer but big is worse than
a society that is dangerous but small.
You have to explain why making society safer and increasing lifespan and health is a bad thing (or at least not a good thing)
Until you do that you are not listening to anything but your own voice.
We HAVE seen the statistics.
That's WHY we think the world is better now than it used to be.
Simply posting more statistics doesn't do anything but reinforce OUR arguments.