1 edit
Originally posted by Proper Knobno waffle tambourine boy, just pure unadulterated reason, the fact that I have not read your science books does not in any shape or form indicate that i do not read scientific articles at all and in fact as I point out, in some instances I have read more than you.
That was a lot of waffle which didn't answer the question. Try again me old son.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieGood. I have a book here for you to read then. Message me your address and I'll get it popped in the post on Monday.
no waffle tambourine boy, just pure unadulterated reason, the fact that I have not read your science books does not in any shape or form indicate that i do not read scientific articles at all and in fact as I point out, in some instances I have read more than you.
- Joined
- 16 Jan 07
- Moves
- 95105
Originally posted by sonship"And I don't think all of these laws were accompanied by a death sentence.
Suzzani, without getting into each of these concepts Stella has mentioned, a good book is by Paul Capon called [b]"Is God a Moral Monter? Making sense of the Old Testament God."
Its a good resource on objections like those raised by skeptics of the Bible.
Without taking time for much study I notice a few things with Stella's list:
[quo ...[text shortened]... ves." [/b]
Our command is to abide in Christ and allow Him to abide in us - John 15. [/b]
This is hype on Stella's part."
hype??? im asking the question are these's sins? they are all things that displease god, so if not, how do we know which things god does consider as a sin. do you have a method of figuring out what is a sin and what is not?
on a side note, your explanation for why woman cannot grab mens 'bits' during a fight left me particularly cold. if i was god my main concern regarding physical violence between a man and wife would be to spread the word that violence towards woman is not acceptable...........but no, god has no problem with a man fighting a woman, his main concern is the dudes gonads.......if ever anything was clearly written by a man and not a loving god this has to be it.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieScience creationist? Now there's an oxymoron if ever there was one.
I like my science creationist not materialist. Got any creation science books, send them up the road!
Funnily enough, I'm reading a creationist 'science book' at the moment (unlike you I'm not an intellectual wimp). It's hilarious. You can have it after me if you like.
Originally posted by Proper Knobhilarious? what does it have, funny cartoons?
Science creationist? Now there's an oxymoron if ever there was one.
Funnily enough, I'm reading a creationist 'science book' at the moment (unlike you I'm not an intellectual wimp). It's hilarious. You can have it after me if you like.
Originally posted by stellspalfieThat is correct, I'm sad because they didn't need to be there. The justice
you say its sad because they didn't need to be there, rather than its sad because they are suffering. implying that your morality is based more on the value you place on peoples decision making rather than the value you place on other peoples feelings and emotions.
of it isn't something you or I, I believe can grasp since neither you or I can
really see how nasty sin is and how a life of love should have been. So if
a judgment is made that has a punishment to it, if we don't see the need we
will never agree to its fairness or rightness to it.
Kelly
Originally posted by Grampy BobbyI agree the FULL human race has it's sin paid for, that does not mean that
Unconfessed sin in a believer's life is the cause of loss of fellowship (I John 1:9 has been provided for the restoration of fellowship). Overt and covert sin in an unbeliever's life is not the issue in salvation. Christ paid the price of sin for the entire human race during His substitutionary spiritual death; during the final three hours of His ...[text shortened]... t believed in the name [person] of the only begotten [uniquely born] Son of God." (John 3:16-18)
everyone in the FULL human race will answer God's call to find it.
Kelly