2 edits
-Removed-The thread has certainly been 'contrasty,' with several sub-threads and cross-dialogs running concurrently.
If the volume of TUs and TDs is any indication, others too appear to have been following with interest who may not have actively contributed.
PS apologies if my particular exchange with Eladar hijacked your thread.
@eladar saidYou take any querying of a belief, especially your beliefs, to be an affront. If beliefs had never been queried, Copernicus, Galileo, et al would have kept their thoughts to themselves and we'd all still think the Earth to be an immovable pancake at the center of the universe, medical doctors would still believe in the four humours and still bleed people, the mentally disturbed would still be chained to asylum walls and left to rot, there would be no bills of rights guaranteeing freedom of press/speech/religion—there'd still be the divine right of despots. All progress depends on challenging what people think they know most certainly and on the best authority; and that means putting someone, somewhere, sometime, on the back foot; if he takes offence at it, that's his problem.
Of course he is. As long as he is surrounded by other skin heads like yourself it gets joked about. Do it around your sister and she will not be around you.
You are a sick and twisted bunch, you skin heads. Nice truce lol
@ghost-of-a-duke saidThe hate is still the same. To answer ypu question I have been around a couple.
Have you ever met a skin head?
2 edits
@moonbus saidYour problem stems from your arrogant point of view. I do not know how to get past your point of view so I can only warn you. I doubt skin heads can see how they are wrong either.
You take any querying of a belief, especially your beliefs, to be an affront. If beliefs had never been queried, Copernicus, Galileo, et al would have kept their thoughts to themselves and we'd all still think the Earth to be an immovable pancake at the center of the universe, medical doctors would still believe in the four humours and still bleed people, the mentally ...[text shortened]... omeone, somewhere, sometime, on the back foot; if he takes offence at it, that's his problem.
@dj2becker saidOf course some would but I do not answer their questions disrespectfully to their beliefs.
Some people might view your point of view as arrogant.
I answer their questions based on what they believe giving it respect.
He was not respectful to his sister's beliefs.
-Removed-We've been back and forth on this forever, or at least it seems so. Clearly you have adopted a more colorful adaptation of what I said, perhaps as a result of 'hearing what you wanted to hear' and over-emphasizing what was actually said to make it appear more unbelievable. But, yes, I have saved more than one life with CPR, I have taken homeless people to the hospital, I have broken bar tables, although they were not MY sexual molesters, for the most part, and I have been visited by angels, although on only one occasion. As I've said before, that you live a dull, placid life is not my problem, although you seem to want to make it so.
But, you do you.
@suzianne saidIt was your claim that you had "lost count of how many lives" you'd saved by giving CPR "on the sidewalk" that caused several people to query the story. At what number of saved lives does one no longer remember how many there were? Twenty? Thirty? Two?
I have saved more than one life with CPR