1 edit
@secondson saidLiving on an archipelago, I have been able to travel around a fair bit from island to island thanks to the theory of flight. The experience has done much to broaden my world view.
The thing I find curiously odd is how people can adopt a philosophical world view based on a theory.
Does your world view rely, in part, on the belief that airplanes cannot fly and that it's only a theory that they can?
@fmf saidBizarre.
Does your world view rely, in part, on the belief that airplanes cannot fly and that it's only a theory that they can?
Since when is it a theory that airplanes can fly?
Evolution is based on theoretical speculation. It's not a fact. You do understand that don't you?
@secondson saidYou seem to be unaware of how the word "theory" is used in science.
Bizarre.
Since when is it a theory that airplanes can fly?
Evolution is based on theoretical speculation. It's not a fact. You do understand that don't you?
@secondson said"If there's no God why do you waste your time trying to prove it?" was a silly and irrelevant question from you that was not relevant to the point of contention between you and Ghost of a Duke.
All the while people like you and Ghost of a Duke obfuscate rebuttal by ignoring the salient points made by your opponents and focus on mundane issues and asking irrelevant questions not relative to the points of contention.
@secondson saidYou've simply misunderstood the word 'theory' in a scientific context. It's not the same as the unsupported notion that cheese gives you nightmares.
And to prove that you'll throw in a plethora of theoretical propositions asserting that evolution is a scientific fact. Spare me.
The thing I find curiously odd is how people can adopt a philosophical world view based on a theory. To support that philosophical world view they convince themselves that evolution has to be true, otherwise their house of cards comes tumbling ...[text shortened]... uffering to a nameless faceless force called evolution. Obtuse reasoning. Not very well thought out.
'A scientific theory is a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world, based on a body of facts that have been repeatedly confirmed through observation and experiment.'
(wiki).
@secondson saidYou view the existence of suffering a mundane issue?
All the while people like you and Ghost of a Duke obfuscate rebuttal by ignoring the salient points made by your opponents and focus on mundane issues and asking irrelevant questions not relative to the points of contention.
@ghost-of-a-duke saidNo. What I consider mundane is prattle about things off topic, like your question, which insinuates an accusation.
You view the existence of suffering a mundane issue?
@secondson saidIt was you who introduced the word 'mundane.' When I discuss issues such as suffering it is something I am posting about with genuine interest and I fail to see where mundanity comes into it.
No. What I consider mundane is prattle about things off topic, like your question, which insinuates an accusation.