1. I pity the fool!
    Joined
    22 Jan '05
    Moves
    22874
    19 Jun '09 21:16
    Just as a boost fo atris credibility he and heng (the two largest game consumers the site has seen) are currently the only checkmaters on the opening page.
  2. THORNINYOURSIDE
    Joined
    04 Sep '04
    Moves
    245624
    20 Jun '09 13:38
    Originally posted by Renars
    yeah, it does make you wonder, doesn't it... why on earth people undertake this amount of games.. what's the point if 60% are lost due to timeout..
    Who knows, 19.79% is a far more acceptable figure 😛
  3. Standard membersbacat
    Eddie's Dad
    Raving Mad
    Joined
    13 Jun '08
    Moves
    268608
    20 Jun '09 14:01
    Originally posted by adramforall
    Who knows, 19.79% is a far more acceptable figure 😛
    I know what you mean. Like I needed one more way to be an underachiever! 😀
  4. Joined
    15 Aug '05
    Moves
    96595
    20 Jun '09 15:421 edit

    This post is unavailable.

    Please refer to our posting guidelines.

  5. Joined
    11 Nov '05
    Moves
    43938
    20 Jun '09 17:17
    The post that was quoted here has been removed
    Oh, that's why...
  6. THORNINYOURSIDE
    Joined
    04 Sep '04
    Moves
    245624
    20 Jun '09 18:27
    The post that was quoted here has been removed
    Make you wonder why you pay to play more games. You'd be as well subbing up, starting a thousand games, unsubbing, then when your game limit gets low, resubbing and starting the process again.
  7. Standard membersbacat
    Eddie's Dad
    Raving Mad
    Joined
    13 Jun '08
    Moves
    268608
    20 Jun '09 19:21
    Originally posted by adramforall
    Make you wonder why you pay to play more games. You'd be as well subbing up, starting a thousand games, unsubbing, then when your game limit gets low, resubbing and starting the process again.
    Only if you were a complete a$$hat with zero conscience and a bankrupt soul. But if stunts of this nature are your predilection (and I've said this before) you have much bigger problems than winning a few chess games will solve.
  8. I pity the fool!
    Joined
    22 Jan '05
    Moves
    22874
    20 Jun '09 21:45
    Originally posted by adramforall
    Make you wonder why you pay to play more games. You'd be as well subbing up, starting a thousand games, unsubbing, then when your game limit gets low, resubbing and starting the process again.
    Why do you think I havent resubscribed yet?
  9. Joined
    07 Mar '09
    Moves
    27933
    21 Jun '09 00:091 edit
    Who wants to bet that the 60% goes up?
  10. is no semi-colon
    Joined
    14 Dec '08
    Moves
    23029
    21 Jun '09 10:55
    The post that was quoted here has been removed
    that's good news - at least he can't join tournaments now.

    i scored him in a tournament last week, and sure enough, our games are at move 1 & 2, and he's already well into his timebank.
  11. Joined
    03 Nov '08
    Moves
    15420
    22 Jun '09 18:16
    He's lost 1718 games by timeout. But he's also won 518 games by timeout.
  12. THORNINYOURSIDE
    Joined
    04 Sep '04
    Moves
    245624
    22 Jun '09 21:18
    Originally posted by Tyrannosauruschex
    Why do you think I havent resubscribed yet?
    Well a look at your history on the site, I would suggest the reason you have not resubbed is you cannot cope with a large number of games.

    When you play high volumes of games you play as a sub 1800 player however, reduce gameload and you become a 2,100 plus player.

    90 days
    Highest Rating 2128
    Average Rating 2122
    Lowest Rating 2113
    Games Rated 14

    1 Year
    Highest Rating 2128
    Average Rating 2069
    Lowest Rating 1983
    Games Rated 83

    5 Years
    Highest Rating 2157
    Average Rating 1957
    Lowest Rating 1655
    Games Rated 717
  13. Joined
    07 Mar '09
    Moves
    27933
    28 Jun '09 15:50
    61.52% and climbing...
  14. Joined
    07 Mar '09
    Moves
    27933
    28 Jun '09 15:52
    I particularly enjoyed this game: http://www.timeforchess.com/gameanalysis/boardhistory.php?gameid=6428235

    Was Fischer wrong?
  15. Subscriberjb70
    State of Confusion
    Lancashire
    Joined
    04 May '08
    Moves
    842388
    28 Jun '09 16:06
    Originally posted by TerrierJack
    I particularly enjoyed this game: http://www.timeforchess.com/gameanalysis/boardhistory.php?gameid=6428235

    Was Fischer wrong?
    Like Clinton:"I Never Had Sex With THAT Lady, Miss Lewinsky."
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree