@the-gravedigger saidI disagree with your disagreement.
I disagree.
Disagreeable people should be lined up and shot.
Their dogs should be shot, too. Twice.
@the-gravedigger saidI disagree with your disagreement.
I disagree.
@averagejoe1 saidSee previous post.
Juror: “There has been no crime established. When you are presenting a case in the opening days, you should be trying to get our attention. I will submit to you that we do not ‘see where the crime is at.’ Where is the evidence of President Trump doing wrong?”
You fellers are getting ahead of your skis. There is no crime being shown. Think deep. You will see. Do you see ‘the crime’? You are all thinking like sonnyhouse.
@mott-the-hoople saidIt is not necessary to show a prior conviction. What the prosecution has to show is intent to commit a further crime (such as tax fraud &/or campaign finance fraud) in having committed the first one (paying hush money and pretending it was a) a tax-deductible business expense and b) a campaign 'donation' ).
when was Trump convicted of violating Fed election law?
@greenpawn34 saidSpeaking of the analysis room ...
I'm with you mchill regarding these new fangled clocks. I get one of the kids
to set them at league matches etc and I have the instructions.
(you should be able to get a copy on the net )
The change in atmosphere at tournaments from the late 60's to early 2020's
(when I played) to today is very different.
In the olden days we would gather around a board in the ...[text shortened]... T.D. to organise,
they can do the draw at random because nobody can remember who they have played.
@averagejoe1 saidWhat's the crime in the so-called hush-money case? Falsifying financial records. Here's a summary from the indictment:
@AverageJoe1
THE crime.
Again, not ALL of alleged crimes of All cases. Obviously not my OP.
@averagejoe1 saidFalsifying financial records. It’s a felony.
@kmax87
But, What is This crime? Should I rephrase?
@carnivorum saidIt is really that simple.
So we agree that there is no scientific explanation what so ever for the existence of duons.
So it should be clear to everybody that the only rational explanation is intelligent design.
And there we have our Intelligent Designer.
We call Him "God".
It is really that simple.
@averagejoe1 saidDon’t mince words. Interfering in one is, and so is falsifying financial records pertaining to a campaign. I expect Marauder can cite chapter and verse.
What are we to be considering for making a decision? Influencing an election is not a crime. Fact from Avjoe.
@sonhouse saidOnly in Amerika is this not considered insane.
https://www.cnn.com/2024/04/27/us/tennessee-governor-signs-school-guns-bill/index.html#:~:text=Tennessee%20Gov.%20Bill%20Lee%20signed,to%20the%20General%20Assembly's%20website.
Yeah, that will stop crazed teenagers from killing kids, give guns to teachers who don't even know how to shoot. Or how about the scenario where some bad kids attack the teacher, steal the gun and ...[text shortened]... eh? Nice putting yet more guns right next to kids who may kill if they could get their hands on one.
@mchill saidWe know where cronyism leads: straight to banana republic.
But for me, I do not want answers anymore.
I understand, those answers can be painful. Biden puts experienced professionals in charge of government departments. Trump - Family members, TV show hosts, ex models and playmates (colorful, but not very effective!) So, I can understand why you don't want answers. 😲
@no1marauder said<<Conroy says Trump's comment that Pecker is "nice" is a message to other witnesses.
"Pecker also revealed that his tabloid had never had a "catch-and-kill" agreement with Trump prior to his candidacy for president." https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/other/top-3-takeaways-from-day-6-of-trump-s-hush-money-trial/ar-AA1nxddF
OUCH.
@suzianne saidTrump's people are pressuring NE to change how their electors vote. In most states, it's winner take all, but in NE, electors vote proportionately (some voted Biden, some voted Trump last time, same as the Cornhuskers themselves voted). Trump's people figured out that every EC vote counts, so they are pressuring NE to adopt the winner-take-all system. It's gerrymandering with a different name.
Or just abolish the electoral college completely.
Direct popular vote (one person, one vote) is more fair and equitable. Not counting my vote because the guy I voted for didn't get the majority in my state is just adding insult to injury.
@no1marauder said"At least if he wins, I'll be pardoned for electoral fraud."
Pecker's testimony today didn't tell us anything we've haven't known for years, but it got into evidence that Trump was directly involved in scheming with Pecker and others for them to use funds to help his campaign far in excess of legally allowable limits. This bolsters two of the theories regarding the intent to commit another crime which elevates the falsification of ...[text shortened]... and kill" payments were to protect Trump's family rather than directly linked to the 2016 election.