Originally posted by cmsMasterA few malcontents don't create a "shadow of doubt". The top six are all well qualified though some are more qualified than others. You, on the other hand, don't have any of the advantages they do and your attitude in this thread as well as your "ban first, ask questions later" statement shows you are temperamentally unsuited for the job.
There have been shadows of doubt around at least 2 of those top 6. I, on the other hand, have no shadows at all.
Oh yeah...jerkoff.
Originally posted by no1marauderReally, top 6?
A few malcontents don't create a "shadow of doubt". The top six are all well qualified though some are more qualified than others. You, on the other hand, don't have any of the advantages they do and your attitude in this thread as well as your "ban first, ask questions later" statement shows you are temperamentally unsuited for the job.
What makes you think you're so well qualified? Your 1500 OTB rating?
Originally posted by no1marauderBan first ask questions later has a lot of merit actually.
A few malcontents don't create a "shadow of doubt". The top six are all well qualified though some are more qualified than others. You, on the other hand, don't have any of the advantages they do and your attitude in this thread as well as your "ban first, ask questions later" statement shows you are temperamentally unsuited for the job.
Originally posted by cmsMasterI'm gonna disagree here. Consider that this site costs money to play on for the vast majority of users, since RHP has so many nice features. If you ban first and ask later, you run the risk of banning a lot of people that aren't guilty, having them get upset, and leaving, when they did nothing wrong. I would be willing to imagine that some of the stronger players on this site have games that are very well played and have a high match up rate. If your opponent realizes this and reports you, the game mods look at it, and decide to ban the guy and then check his games, that's an injustice. Besides, when does any body assume guiltiness before it's proven? It's just a silly and rash idea.
Ban first ask questions later has a lot of merit actually.
Originally posted by !~TONY~!I don't mean ban right when the accusation comes through, I just mean speed the process up - a lot. For example, if there are a number of games that look suspicious and have high match up rates it shouldn't take months for a ban to occur - it should take a week or two, imo. Perhaps they could be put on probation after this time (i.e. no starting new games until cleared).
I'm gonna disagree here. Consider that this site costs money to play on for the vast majority of users, since RHP has so many nice features. If you ban first and ask later, you run the risk of banning a lot of people that aren't guilty, having them get upset, and leaving, when they did nothing wrong. I would be willing to imagine that some of the stronger p ...[text shortened]... , when does any body assume guiltiness before it's proven? It's just a silly and rash idea.
Originally posted by cmsMaster"Speed the process up" are only words if you have no real idea how current system works and you have no concrete proposals how to change it.
I don't mean ban right when the accusation comes through, I just mean speed the process up - a lot. For example, if there are a number of games that look suspicious and have high match up rates it shouldn't take months for a ban to occur - it should take a week or two, imo. Perhaps they could be put on probation after this time (i.e. no starting new games until cleared).
Originally posted by cmsMasterNo, but it's 1503 points higher than your OTB rating.
Really, top 6?
What makes you think you're so well qualified? Your 1500 OTB rating?
I've stated my qualifications. What you mostly did is cast aspersions on other candidates including insinuations that they are cheats. Insinuations without any evidence, mind you. That you would do so in the public forums while also stating "you'd ban first, ask questions later" makes you a poor choice indeed.
If you haven't decided on your 3 choices, read through this thread carefully and judge for yourself the candidates most likely to be conscientious, hardworking people who will work together as a team to make decisions without favouritism or prejudice. If you're still not sure, check out the other forum postings made by the same person, when they were not being "on their best behaviour" in this thread.
1 edit
Originally posted by MissOleumThis is their best behaviour? Right, I'll go change my vote now...
If you haven't decided on your 3 choices, read through this thread carefully and judge for yourself the candidates most likely to be conscientious, hardworking people who will work together as a team to make decisions without favouritism or prejudice. If you're still not sure, check out the other forum postings made by the same person, when they were not being "on their best behaviour" in this thread.
I still favour a Cheat Finder General. With a nice hat and maybe a cheat sniffing crocodile.
Wow, nice popularity contest. I cast two votes then viewed the results.
Now I will withdraw them because I think this voting idea is silly.
Reminds me of those websites where you get all your friends to give you 10 out 10 score and give your enemies a 1 out 10 score to see who the most popular person is on that website.
Originally posted by TalonBossIt's clear from your post that you have personal issues with someone that has many votes and therefore don't want him in the Mod Team. Your own disagreement is then based on popularity.
Wow, nice popularity contest. I cast two votes then viewed the results.
Now I will withdraw them because I think this voting idea is silly.
Reminds me of those websites where you get all your friends to give you 10 out 10 score and give your enemies a 1 out 10 score to see who the most popular person is on that website.
The amount of hypocrisy in this thread is simply unbelievable.