50d
@AverageJoe1
You really think we bitch about people having too much money? We BITCH about those folks paying 3% income tax if any at all. THAT is what we are bitching about and you know that full well but are hell bent on weaponizing money as usual.
50d
@shavixmir saidpeople not having enough money is a direct consequence of people having a whole lot of money
I don't care about people having a whole lot of money.
I care about people not having enough money. And that is something completely different.
@shavixmir saidMaking rich give money to the poor in the end hurts everyone. Can't believe you can't figure that out. Everyone loses. See recent thread, Corp taxes hurt taxpayers.
Your problem is such: your mind is made up about a subject, let’s call it A. You pose questions and when the answers don’t fit A, you scream that nobody is answering you.
And during your scream, you neglect to check what other people are actually saying.
So, you think that I have a problem with rich people. You were wrong. I couldn’t care less about rich people.
You ...[text shortened]... his doesn’t neccesarily mean they actually have a problem with someone yachting all over the planet.
There is no question that the majority of posters want to take money away from the rich. I guess you are an exception.?? Your 4-star general Bernie Sanders actually has said to limit how much someone should be allowed to make, and has touched on how much someone needs to live on. Given your occasional comments, I would say that I need about 320 times more to live on than you do, so Bernie is out the window.
You are extremely disingenuous saying you are not a liberal. No explanation needed for that. Hard to read a post from you wherein you say something so ludicrous.
@AverageJoe1
You are so full of shyte the top of your head is brown. If more taxes come in from corps that revenue will build bridges, lower the national debt, shore up our medical system, and the like. You really think all of a sudden billions will go to lazy no good homeless folks living in tents? Maybe there will be money to house those folks instead of the country being embarrassed by people living in tents downtown but of course you would never allow THAT, since they are all worthless lazy bums.
@sonhouse saidSonhouse says that we can get enough money from the Rich that there will be enough there to build houses to put people in. Would I lie? That is exactly what he is saying. He wants rich people to step up to the plate and pay for anything that the libs want done. Fool. Hey Sonhouse, I see where you want the rich to pay for building bridges, lowering the national debt, and shoring up our medical system. You also say, ‘and the like.’ What he means when he says the like? I think it means anything that the liberals want to be paid for by someone else. I think that’s what he means when he says the like. Next he will say that the average man, not the rich, should pay off tuition loans. Do you think that that could lead to paying off credit card debt?
@AverageJoe1
You are so full of shyte the top of your head is brown. If more taxes come in from corps that revenue will build bridges, lower the national debt, shore up our medical system, and the like. You really think all of a sudden billions will go to lazy no good homeless folks living in tents? Maybe there will be money to house those folks instead of the country being ...[text shortened]... in tents downtown but of course you would never allow THAT, since they are all worthless lazy bums.
I Read you for entertainment Sonhouse. I hope that does not hurt your feelings. All of you are basically so pitiful. Did you see on another thread where Zazie says that he is not a liberal. Maybe it is a facetious way of his saying he is beyond liberal.? Why, we can all have a belly laugh.
PS. What you mean above that I am full of shytee. Everything I say is true, and mostly when I said that I need at least 320 times more than Sony needs to live on. I think actually I need about 1000 times more so, I may have misstated.
50d
@averagejoe1 saidSeems to work quite well all over the planet, though.
Making rich give money to the poor in the end hurts everyone. Can't believe you can't figure that out. Everyone loses. See recent thread, Corp taxes hurt taxpayers.
There is no question that the majority of posters want to take money away from the rich. I guess you are an exception.?? Your 4-star general Bernie Sanders actually has said to limit how much someone s ...[text shortened]... o explanation needed for that. Hard to read a post from you wherein you say something so ludicrous.
So perhaps this is just another of those opinions you mistake for facts?
50d
@shavixmir saidShag pseudy for brains said:
Seems to work quite well all over the planet, though.
So perhaps this is just another of those opinions you mistake for facts?
"Seems to work quite well all over the planet, though."
...which is an opinion, he goes on to say this:
"So perhaps this is just another of those opinions you mistake for facts?"
...without the faintest clue of his own hypocrisy.
It's perfect shatmixer, but not in a good way for you.
49d
@sonhouse saidDoes anyone ever know to whom or what Shytehouse is talking about. He lists Wajoma, but it don't tell us much. It's OK, though. Sonhouse, we can overlook a few of your posts. No explanation....Pleeeeeaaase......
@Wajoma
Oh, hurt to the bone. I have to see my psych now, but he has meds so I will be ok.
49d
@averagejoe1 saidNo idea what he's on about or why, but it looks like he's bragging up how many mind altering drugs he's being prescribed as if how messed up you are is something to be proud of.
Does anyone ever know to whom or what Shytehouse is talking about. He lists Wajoma, but it don't tell us much. It's OK, though. Sonhouse, we can overlook a few of your posts. No explanation....Pleeeeeaaase......
49d
1 edit
@shavixmir saidWhat is 'IT'.?? taking from rich and giving to poor? Socialism? But it doesn't work. A curious post, leaves us hanging as usual. I would love to read a coherent explanation.
Seems to work quite well all over the planet, though.
So perhaps this is just another of those opinions you mistake for facts?
To be fair, it WOULD work in a Shav-type perfect society. He only needs about 20 hours wages a week for a happy life. That would not work for me. I am not a wage guy, but my society demands a bit more income. That is all that would work for me. Shav needs very little, I need very lot.
Apples and oranges?