@mott-the-hoople saidStarr Report: A legal BJ and the subsequent illegal coverup to save a marriage.
Clinton did, Trump didnt…that is your error.
Mueller Report: 37 indictments; seven guilty pleas or convictions; illegal cover up. 14 other criminal matters uncovered and referred to the Department of Justice.
@mott-the-hoople saidIt has never been proven false. In fact, the consensus is now that Russia DID interfere in the 2020 presidential elections, and not for Clinton. It's transparently easy to understand why Putin preferred Trump to win. He's a puppet.
you perform like a well trained monkey...did all the investigations about russia only finding it was clinton and the democrats colluding with russia not register with you? they ingrained it in your brain didnt they? now that it has been proven false why do you continue with it?
You say so because Trump, a known liar, says so.
Why do you idolize a known liar?
@suzianne said“ It has never been proven false.”
It has never been proven false. In fact, the consensus is now that Russia DID interfere in the 2020 presidential elections, and not for Clinton. It's transparently easy to understand why Putin preferred Trump to win. He's a puppet.
You say so because Trump, a known liar, says so.
Why do you idolize a known liar?
yes it has
@mott-the-hoople saidIn your head, maybe.
“ It has never been proven false.”
yes it has
Adults know better.
@sonhouse saidSo votes changed, right?
THAT was a shocker. I ASSUMED they would come out with Chinese bamboo, fake ballots, Communist takeovers or some such and THOUSANDS of votes missed for Trump.
All that BS, MONTHS long for NOTHING which HAS to tick off the ultrarightwingnutjobs.
They actually found several HUNDRED more votes for Biden missed by the first audit.
Krebs said that could not happen. This proved him wrong again. Right?
1 edit
@metal-brain saidOf course votes will change upon recount. This has been shown many many times. But the votes change by dozens or a few hundred, rarely enough to alter outcomes, and it's rarely clear whether the original count or the recount is more accurate.
So votes changed, right?
Krebs said that could not happen. This proved him wrong again. Right?
I think the Krebs quote you're referring to was in the context of the ability of foreign entities to change vote tallies. Cyber Ninja's found none of that.
@mott-the-hoople saidHow many times do you Trump minions have to be schooled on elections?
that was the count, the count included the fraudulent votes described later in the article .
There were thousands, including duplicates, no signature ect.
Also it was stated the election should not have been certified.
https://apnews.com/article/donald-trump-joe-biden-elections-arizona-voting-ec714036dccf6adb09966561776cc046
@metal-brain saidSo votes changed, right?
So votes changed, right?
Krebs said that could not happen. This proved him wrong again. Right?
This is why they have a automatic recount if an election is close.
@wildgrass saidThat isn't what Krebs said. What you think is irrelevant unless you can prove it. I think he meant this or that is BS nonsense. His statement is what really matters. His statement was false when he made it (Antrim County MI) and it has been verified as A lie again with this change of votes.
Of course votes will change upon recount. This has been shown many many times. But the votes change by dozens or a few hundred, rarely enough to alter outcomes, and it's rarely clear whether the original count or the recount is more accurate.
I think the Krebs quote you're referring to was in the context of the ability of foreign entities to change vote tallies. Cyber Ninja's found none of that.
Krebs said nothing about outcome in his statement. You are attempting to move the goal post. Shame on you.
@mott-the-hoople saidi think you should give them more money to do another recount then
“ It has never been proven false.”
yes it has
1 edit
@metal-brain saidThats why I wrote "I think." Please provide the quote you're referring to and that will clear this up. It seems odd that an elections official would say what you wrote. We all remember Bush v. Gore.
That isn't what Krebs said. What you think is irrelevant unless you can prove it. I think he meant this or that is BS nonsense. His statement is what really matters. His statement was false when he made it (Antrim County MI) and it has been verified as A lie again with this change of votes.
Krebs said nothing about outcome in his statement. You are attempting to move the goal post. Shame on you.
@metal-brain saidVotes don't change.
So votes changed, right?
Krebs said that could not happen. This proved him wrong again. Right?
The count changes because of errors in counting.
Votes don't change.