Go back
Arizona Fraudit: BIDEN WON.

Arizona Fraudit: BIDEN WON.

Debates


@Metal-Brain
So you don't even believe that Ninja Turtle dude who runs the Arizona fraudit?
He said there was no fraud.

I guess no matter how many such fraudits happen, since your god king Trump, whom you claim to hate🙂 says it every day.

If your god king stops with that nonsense, so will the rest of the country, maybe.

Trump is ABSOLUTELY the most evil, worse POTUS in American history BECAUSE he is attempting a COUP and that is EXACTLY what happened Jan 6 and his coup attempt is going on as we speak.


@sonhouse said
@Metal-Brain
So you don't even believe that Ninja Turtle dude who runs the Arizona fraudit?
He said there was no fraud.

I guess no matter how many such fraudits happen, since your god king Trump, whom you claim to hate🙂 says it every day.

If your god king stops with that nonsense, so will the rest of the country, maybe.

Trump is ABSOLUTELY the most evil, worse PO ...[text shortened]... empting a COUP and that is EXACTLY what happened Jan 6 and his coup attempt is going on as we speak.
Evidence that may undermine the existence of a conspiracy is just more evidence that the conspiracy is real. The auditors are in on it. It's classic conspiracy theory logic.


@wildgrass said
Evidence that may undermine the existence of a conspiracy is just more evidence that the conspiracy is real. The auditors are in on it. It's classic conspiracy theory logic.
You mean like the Russiagate conspiracy theory that democrats will not let go? Same thing, right?


@moonbus said
The burden of proof is on those who claim that fraud occurred.
Does that apply to the Russiagate conspiracy theory too?
Democrats did not meet that burden of proof, so why do you have faith in that conspiracy theory? There is no proof.


@metal-brain said
You mean like the Russiagate conspiracy theory that democrats will not let go? Same thing, right?
Except that Russia DID directly influence the 2016 election. It didn't just "go away" because you didn't like it.

Do you have ANY idea what a fact actually is?

Vote Up
Vote Down

@metal-brain said
Does that apply to the Russiagate conspiracy theory too?
Democrats did not meet that burden of proof, so why do you have faith in that conspiracy theory? There is no proof.
There's plenty of proof.

Go do your homework before fantisizing.


@wildgrass said
We have integrated many means by which to check that elections are being conducted fairly and in a non-partisan way. Audits are not required.

I suppose it could happen here, if those checks are removed. However, they have not. The only reason this particular election was thrown into question was because the guy with the biggest loudspeaker started saying that he would only lose the election if it was rigged.
That is not true.

Mail in ballots are extremely vulnerable to fraud, especially vote buying. It is easy to buy votes that way and even easier to get away with.

https://www.wsj.com/articles/heed-jimmy-carter-on-the-danger-of-mail-in-voting-11586557667

Trump was not wrong. He was right.
I know democrats don't want to accept Trump could be right about anything, but even a jerk can be right sometimes.

You are repeating a myth because you want to believe it, but you didn't believe it when HRC said trump was an illegitimate POTUS who knew he stole the election from her.

Why did you believe it then but not now?


@suzianne said
There's plenty of proof.

Go do your homework before fantisizing.
Then you can give me the proof, right?


@suzianne said
Except that Russia DID directly influence the 2016 election. It didn't just "go away" because you didn't like it.

Do you have ANY idea what a fact actually is?
How?
Talk is cheap. Where is the evidence?

2 edits

@metal-brain said
Does that apply to the Russiagate conspiracy theory too?
Democrats did not meet that burden of proof, so why do you have faith in that conspiracy theory? There is no proof.
<<The Intelligence Community was correct in its assessment of Russian meddling in the lead-up to the 2016 elections, a bipartisan report released by the Senate Intelligence Committee on Tuesday concluded.

The report, which is the fourth of an expected five volumes to emerge from the committee’s investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 elections, digs into the Intelligence Community’s Assessment (ICA) of Russian active measures used to sway the election.

The assessment, made public in early 2017 shortly before President Obama left office, concluded that Russian President Vladimir Putin “ordered an influence campaign in 2016 aimed at the US presidential election,” and that there was a “clear preference” for now-President Trump to win the election on the part of the Russians.

The committee concluded that the ICA “presents a coherent and well-constructed intelligence basis for the case of unprecedented Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. presidential election,” and that all analysts involved in compiling the ICA were under no pressure to come to a specific conclusion.>>

https://thehill.com/policy/cybersecurity/493889-bipartisan-senate-report-reaffirms-intelligence-community-findings-that


Below is a link to the Senate report itself:

https://www.intelligence.senate.gov/publications/report-select-committee-intelligence-united-states-senate-russian-active-measures

PS That committee was chaired by a Republican.


@moonbus said
<<The Intelligence Community was correct in its assessment of Russian meddling in the lead-up to the 2016 elections, a bipartisan report released by the Senate Intelligence Committee on Tuesday concluded.

The report, which is the fourth of an expected five volumes to emerge from the committee’s investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 elections, digs into the In ...[text shortened]... gence-united-states-senate-russian-active-measures

PS That committee was chaired by a Republican.
Where is the evidence?
How did Russia interfere with the election? Anybody can claim the allegations are supported when they are not. Your source doesn't give a single example.

https://www.theepochtimes.com/mkt_morningbrief/inspector-general-audit-finds-widespread-problems-with-fbis-fisa-applications-2_4025260.[WORD TOO LONG]


@Metal-Brain

Read the Senate report. Indictments followed and people were sent to prison. Proof beyond a reasonable doubt.


@moonbus said
@Metal-Brain

Read the Senate report. Indictments followed and people were sent to prison. Proof beyond a reasonable doubt.
People going to prison doesn't prove election meddling. Perjury isn't election meddling. You need to cite an example.


@Metal-Brain
You are really a piece of work. You are a really GREAT Putin/Trump parrot.
So do they pay you like in a brown bag in a trash can in the park or is it more obvious?


@sonhouse said
@Metal-Brain
You are really a piece of work. You are a really GREAT Putin/Trump parrot.
So do they pay you like in a brown bag in a trash can in the park or is it more obvious?
So you cannot prove it either.
FAIL!

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.