1 edit
@metal-brain saidYou blather on about evidence that has already been proffered, and yet you post another screed from another Republican-fantasy conspiracy-theory website.
Where is the evidence?
How did Russia interfere with the election? Anybody can claim the allegations are supported when they are not. Your source doesn't give a single example.
https://www.theepochtimes.com/mkt_morningbrief/inspector-general-audit-finds-widespread-problems-with-fbis-fisa-applications-2_4025260.html?utm_source=morningbriefnoe&utm_medium=email&utm_campa ...[text shortened]... c984bb68800444fc52ddf3a39&est=U7nytOO%2F8%2FOKhoOWI4cSJr8GjqRwjiH6jeUEmnM36jbmtIoKq8wArOGqGuF7spA%3D
Oh, and just so you know, you can't trust anything put out by Durham. The man is another partisan Trump-agent.
@metal-brain saidIt says a lot that you're quoting Jimmy Carter hypotheticals here. If fraud clearly happened, hypotheticals are not necessary.
That is not true.
Mail in ballots are extremely vulnerable to fraud, especially vote buying. It is easy to buy votes that way and even easier to get away with.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/heed-jimmy-carter-on-the-danger-of-mail-in-voting-11586557667
Trump was not wrong. He was right.
I know democrats don't want to accept Trump could be right about anything, bu ...[text shortened]... egitimate POTUS who knew he stole the election from her.
Why did you believe it then but not now?
It's ALWAYS possible that some thing happened but we don't know it because it was stealthily covered up. The possibility that something could happen is not what's being discussed here. We're talking about what evidence there is that it did.
@wildgrass saidIf the evidence was covered up we will never know.
It says a lot that you're quoting Jimmy Carter hypotheticals here. If fraud clearly happened, hypotheticals are not necessary.
It's ALWAYS possible that some thing happened but we don't know it because it was stealthily covered up. The possibility that something could happen is not what's being discussed here. We're talking about what evidence there is that it did.
That is my point.
Nobody knows how much voter fraud there is. Those that claim they do are just fooling themselves. We only know how much voter fraud is caught. WE do not know how much has not been caught.
@Metal-Brain
You continue to puke out the Putin/Trump line.
Before Trump there were LITEREALLY hundreds of years of practically no fraud, the fraud count done on one hand.
But since Trump just SAID there was fraud, all you hypnotized Trumpites NATURURALLY assume since Trump is you god king, he HAS to be right.
Smooth move, how does it feel to be a traitor?
@sonhouse saidFor 4 years you thought the election was stolen from HRC. You were puking the HRC/ DWS lie. After DWS was forced to resign from the DNC in disgrace for conspiring to rig the primary election for HRC, she hired her to work on her campaign.
@Metal-Brain
You continue to puke out the Putin/Trump line.
Before Trump there were LITEREALLY hundreds of years of practically no fraud, the fraud count done on one hand.
But since Trump just SAID there was fraud, all you hypnotized Trumpites NATURURALLY assume since Trump is you god king, he HAS to be right.
Smooth move, how does it feel to be a traitor?
Then HRC through the DNC colluded with an ex intelligence worker for a foreign government to dig up dirt on Trump. Hey, isn't that exactly what made you mad about Trump? Collusion with a foreign government to dig up dirt on a political opponent is bad, right?
Are you ready to call it opposition research now? Is opposition research only dirty when the republicans do it? How do you rationalize that cognitive dissonance?
@Metal-Brain
The election WAS stolen from Clinton because of the Russians hacking into DNC computers. That is a fact and no amount of your pro Russia traitorous ways will change that.
The fact is you hate the USA and want a government just like Putin, you HATE democracy.
@sonhouse saidThat has been debunked.
@Metal-Brain
The election WAS stolen from Clinton because of the Russians hacking into DNC computers. That is a fact and no amount of your pro Russia traitorous ways will change that.
The fact is you hate the USA and want a government just like Putin, you HATE democracy.
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/2020/05/13/crowdstrike_president_under_oath_no_proof_of_russia_dnc_hack_510974.html#!
Even if they had done (no proof) it that would not prove the election was stolen. Cyber hacking does not equate to election stealing unless they hacked a vote counting machine and got results.
@metal-brain saidAs has been pointed out many many times you can write "if the evidence was covered up we will never know." about literally anything. That is not evidence it is true.
If the evidence was covered up we will never know.
That is my point.
Nobody knows how much voter fraud there is. Those that claim they do are just fooling themselves. We only know how much voter fraud is caught. WE do not know how much has not been caught.
@wildgrass saidDems embraced Russiagate without any evidence at all.
As has been pointed out many many times you can write "if the evidence was covered up we will never know." about literally anything. That is not evidence it is true.
The investigation was started by a mere unconfirmed rumor.
Since when did democrats need evidence to assert election meddling?
Are you willing to refute the Russiagate conspiracy theory?
@Metal-Brain
You really should be under arrest for treason.
Our intel folks pinned down the exact Russian server the attacks came from and when you deny that you are puking out the same BULLSHTYE coming out of your god king Trump AND Putin who is saying the same thing.
You WANT our form of democracy to fail and that is quite clear.
@Metal-Brain
Keep spouting the Putin/Trump line, it makes you look even MORE stupid.
All this rattling does is make you look more and more like a shaking monkey on a 20 foot branch.
Here is a good report on this issue:
https://time.com/5565991/russia-influence-2016-election/
@metal-brain saidOff topic
Dems embraced Russiagate without any evidence at all.
The investigation was started by a mere unconfirmed rumor.
Since when did democrats need evidence to assert election meddling?
Are you willing to refute the Russiagate conspiracy theory?
You can't think something definitely.happened.just.because.it is possible. It's extremely unlikely
@metal-brain saidOff topic
Dems embraced Russiagate without any evidence at all.
The investigation was started by a mere unconfirmed rumor.
Since when did democrats need evidence to assert election meddling?
Are you willing to refute the Russiagate conspiracy theory?
You can't think something definitely.happened.just.because.it is possible. It's extremely unlikely