@averagejoe1 saidWhat part of " illegal or nefarious purposes" didn't you understand?
Overkill!!!!!!???? hahaha. So you want a bit of reduced kill on this matter? Why, what if Hunter found a file in the garage that China paid him big money for. How much kill would be appropriate in that situation?
@sonhouse saidThe fact that Trump is under investigation 3 ways has nothing to do with Biden having his stash in his garage Sonhouse. I am worried about you, you need to get a grip. Your hated Repubs are about to get all the Jan 6 video released......would you write a nice note about that?
@AverageJoe1
And you see no problem with your god king Trump, er, X45, fighting for two YEARS tooth and nail to prevent those docs in his 'care' from being given back to the government, means nothing to you does it?
Or the FACT JACK that a bunch of the docs in Trump's 'care' were EMPTY FOLDERS.
That ALSO means nothing to you zombies does it?
Meanwhile when the docs ...[text shortened]... e you ragging on Biden, isn't he ALSO literally above the law if your god king X45 is above the law?
And all of us find it peculiar that you say no one is above the law, but Biden seems to be, doesn't he, Sonhouse.
Sonhouse.....why has he FBI not raided Biden's house?
"... The surprise revelations that on at least four different occasions Biden’s lawyers found improperly stored classified documents and official records evoked the turmoil surrounding Donald Trump’s presidency, a four-year ruckus from which Biden has tried to move the country past."
------------------------------- Associated Press
What was that, @sonhouse?
1 edit
@no1marauder saidWhat you said was, if we just rephrase your exact comment, that the keeping of this stash in his garage is 'a trivial matter'. You say that it would NOT be trivial if illegal or nefarious. Of course it would not, we all agree. But, you are saying that short of there being illegality, that the keeping of the stash is a trivial matter.
What part of " illegal or nefarious purposes" didn't you understand?
Now, if you dont follow this paragraph, or if I am wrong in my interpretation, could you re-write it for us all?
The stash his a trivial matter. That is what you are saying.
Whew. Now I figure you and Sonhouse both need to cool down.
@averagejoe1 saidI'm not sure why I have to repeat what I just said, which was the same thing I said when documents were found at Margo Largo.
What you said was, if we just rephrase your exact comment, that the keeping of this stash in his garage is 'a trivial matter'. You say that it would NOT be trivial if illegal or nefarious. Of course it would not, we all agree. But, you are saying that short of there being illegality, that the keeping of the stash is a trivial matter.
Now, if you dont follow this ...[text shortened]... atter. That is what you are saying.
Whew. Now I figure you and Sonhouse both need to cool down.
But absent their use for illegal or other nefarious purposes, I don't think the mere possession of such materials by an ex-President or ex-Vice President warrants criminal charges.
2 edits
@AverageJoe1
So tell me the truth, do YOU think your god king X45 is above the law, now or when he was POTUS?
If Biden gets impeached because of this he loses his job.
If your X45 gets caught in court, he goes to jail, a tiny difference.
AND Kamela is POTUS.
I'm SURE you want THAT.
@sonhouse saidyou fools voted for this kamala creature
@AverageJoe1
So tell me the truth, do YOU think your god king X45 is above the law, now or when he was POTUS?
If Biden gets impeached because of this he loses his job.
If your X45 gets caught in court, he goes to jail, a tiny difference.
AND Kamela is POTUS.
I'm SURE you want THAT.
next in line…Kevin McCarthy
@no1marauder said“But absent their use for illegal or other nefarious purposes”
I'm not sure why I have to repeat what I just said, which was the same thing I said when documents were found at Margo Largo.
But absent their use for illegal or other nefarious purposes, I don't think the mere possession of such materials by an ex-President or ex-Vice President warrants criminal charges.
tell us who “the big guy” is …thx
@no1marauder saidUhh, what if they are not under lock and key? Your inept president says 'oh, my corvette is locked in there'. And you ignore how many people have access to the documents, as they would have at Trump's place.
I'm not sure why I have to repeat what I just said, which was the same thing I said when documents were found at Margo Largo.
But absent their use for illegal or other nefarious purposes, I don't think the mere possession of such materials by an ex-President or ex-Vice President warrants criminal charges.
Hunter is extremely tied to China. China has given between and 50 and 100M to Penn University. Let us wonder why. So, Hunter, with all those files, together with relations with our enemy, could bring the USA down.
You are wrong on this one. Pencil in a win for me on this one, and I have not even had my coffee. 😉
@averagejoe1 saidAmong the stupidest things you do is claim you've "won" something by making an utterly incoherent post on a internet forum.
Uhh, what if they are not under lock and key? Your inept president says 'oh, my corvette is locked in there'. And you ignore how many people have access to the documents, as they would have at Trump's place.
Hunter is extremely tied to China. China has given between and 50 and 100M to Penn University. Let us wonder why. So, Hunter, with all those files, togethe ...[text shortened]... ou are wrong on this one. Pencil in a win for me on this one, and I have not even had my coffee. 😉
So you're saying there should be criminal charges brought against both Trump and Biden because others had access to the location classified documents were stored in? Some kind of direct answer would be nice rather than your usual babbling.
@sonhouse saidBiden did more than break rules, he broke the law. You libs want to say he did not. If you say he did, you should follow your statement by saying he should be impeached. Are my posts too simple? Shall I muddy them up like you libs do? I ask you why no FBI raid on Biden, and you don't answer. Yeah, I could indeed scream.
@AverageJoe1
So tell me the truth, do YOU think your god king X45 is above the law, now or when he was POTUS?
If Biden gets impeached because of this he loses his job.
If your X45 gets caught in court, he goes to jail, a tiny difference.
AND Kamela is POTUS.
I'm SURE you want THAT.
Oh, yes, if Trump has broken law when has a jail sentence, he needs to serve the sentence. Both of my points here are undeniable, yet y'all just stay mired. Geez. Everyone here is getting like Sonhouse.
No, Kamala literally could be president for 10 years, since you fellers will likely win votes from all the illegals from here on out.
I do NOT want that. Even you will be hit on for money for Kamala's projects.
@no1marauder saidOK, how about this.....I have not studied the Marolago raids, so I dont know if Trump broke the law. I will humbly pass on that.
Among the stupidest things you do is claim you've "won" something by making an utterly incoherent post on a internet forum.
So you're saying there should be criminal charges brought against both Trump and Biden because others had access to the location classified documents were stored in? Some kind of direct answer would be nice rather than your usual babbling.
But, Biden has broken the law. everyone says he broke the rules, which is muddy city. He broke the law. You gonna sit here and tell me he did not break the law? Let us resolve this question first, and then discuss the next steps.?
Show me I haven't 'won' and I will relent.
Edir: How in he WORLD is my post incoherent to you? Because it is too simple, not awash like liberal-eze?
@averagejoe1 saidOk, how about this:
OK, how about this.....I have not studied the Marolago raids, so I dont know if Trump broke the law. I will humbly pass on that.
But, Biden has broken the law. everyone says he broke the rules, which is muddy city. He broke the law. You gonna sit here and tell me he did not break the law? Let us resolve this question first, and then discuss the next steps.?
...[text shortened]... How in he WORLD is my post incoherent to you? Because it is too simple, not awash like liberal-eze?
You tell me exactly what section of the US Code you think Biden violated and I'll look at it and tell you whether I think he did and if it warrants criminal charges based on what we know now.
Mind you, DOJ has already appointed a Special Prosecutor for this case.