@no1marauder saidhmmm…wonder why biden scrubbed his tax returns for the years hunter was paying him $50,000 per month….that biden didnt report?
The one who might (there was a question mark after Big Guy in the email) have been earmarked for 10% of the profits from a deal that never happened?
https://joebiden.com/financial-disclosure/
@no1marauder saidno, this is what you stated…
I'm more telling you what questions to ask rather than assuming what Brit Hume tells you must be true.
“Biden clearly had authority when he was Vice-President to view and take with him classified documents.”
how do you know this?
@mott-the-hoople saidAre you actually claiming the Vice President of the United States can't view and take with him classified documents?
no, this is what you stated…
“Biden clearly had authority when he was Vice-President to view and take with him classified documents.”
how do you know this?
1 edit
@no1marauder saidA great discussion. One which will produce a debate winner, which is rare here.
Are you actually claiming the Vice President of the United States can't view and take with him classified documents?
Let me interject this little nugget for consideration .
The 7th sentence down refers to presidential records, archive.
There will be others,, I am playing golf
https://www.archives.gov/presidential-libraries/laws/1978-act.html
Marauder is really all about whether something is a law or not, and does not give a crap that a reprobate guy who needed money for condoms, lived in the house where the files were. Wouldn’t that be a more interesting subject? He takes a few files to a Chinese diplomat and he’s like I something you might like to buy from me. You fairies are so light footed about everything you cannot see the forest for arguing about something breaking the law or not. What I just wrote has nothing to do with the law, it has something to do with preservation of the United States of America. I’d rather be a sheep than a fairy .
@averagejoe1 saidWasn't referring to "archives" but to classified materials during someone's term as Vice-President of the United States.
A great discussion. One which will produce a debate winner, which is rare here.
Let me interject this little nugget for consideration .
The 7th sentence down refers to presidential records, archive.
There will be others,, I am playing golf
https://www.archives.gov/presidential-libraries/laws/1978-act.html
@averagejoe1 said"Biden broke the law!"
Marauder is really all about whether something is a law or not, and does not give a crap that a reprobate guy who needed money for condoms, lived in the house where the files were. Wouldn’t that be a more interesting subject? He takes a few files to a Chinese diplomat and he’s like I something you might like to buy from me. You fairies are so light footed about everythin ...[text shortened]... ething to do with preservation of the United States of America. I’d rather be a sheep than a fairy .
"What law?"
"Well, what about Hunter?"
LMAO!!
@no1marauder saidYou never close your comments. Liberalize at its zenith/.
Are you actually claiming the Vice President of the United States can't view and take with him classified documents?
Itr would help us move along if you had said ".....tqke with him classified documents To.......". To, Marauder. Where is he allowed, or not allowed, to take them?
You want me to cancel something as important as golf to hang on my computer to read such an empty, vacuous comment? we learn nothing from it,, and it Certainly does not move one step forward in the discussion.\.
Hmmmm, lets pretend it presents a cogent question......how do you think we should answer it, since it does not close?
@no1marauder saidSo, to be clear, everyone couch your comments, at the behest of Marauder, with the common thread of the 'materials' (files), not the archives. He does not want to hear about the archives.
Wasn't referring to "archives" but to classified materials during someone's term as Vice-President of the United States.
@no1marauder saidYou are scrambling,,,,,pitiful. You know full well is the issue of files getting into the hands of a chinaman. Someone, maybe Hunter, maybe a Chinese gardener at the estate, could easily give files to our enemy. It really is fun, I must admit, to see all the inane defense thoughts you come up with. I wasn't writing about Hunter.
"Biden broke the law!"
"What law?"
"Well, what about Hunter?"
LMAO!!
Please don't dumb down this very good thread.
1 edit
Greg Myer, a National Security Correspondent. We can all agree that he knows more about this than we do? difficult for you ?
Please see his article. The treatment of files was revised with Watergate. Like you, I wonder why the 'law' is not posted, but the nasty Biden is causing a lot trouble that you don't seem to give a damn about. You know, the USA.
Boy, seeing that law is a big deal to you isn't it.
https://www.npr.org/2022/08/13/1117297065/trump-documents-history-national-archives-law-watergate
@averagejoe1 saidFiles are what get kept in an archive you right wing halfwit no one took the archives. Biden mishandled the files that he removed in order to do his job as vice president.
So, to be clear, everyone couch your comments, at the behest of Marauder, with the common thread of the 'materials' (files), not the archives. He does not want to hear about the archives.
This whole thing should be a catalyst for people to demand a functioning system for tracking documents that have been removed and regular audits to ascertain were they are at any given time depending on their classification level.
Silly question but do presidents and vice presidents have undergo security clearance before they can handle these documents?
1 edit
@kevcvs57 saidAhh, pure liberal segue. So, what are you off on, Kev? You are into the reason,, AS IF YOU KNOW the reason, that he took the files.
Files are what get kept in an archive you right wing halfwit no one took the archives. Biden mishandled the files that he removed in order to do his job as vice president.
This whole thing should be a catalyst for people to demand a functioning system for tracking documents that have been removed and regular audits to ascertain were they are at any given time depending on t ...[text shortened]... esidents and vice presidents have undergo security clearance before they can handle these documents?
Help Me Rhonda. So, let us say that is his exact reason...... You see, it makes no difference, since the law was broken from the moment he left with them and went North instead of South, where the archives are. Marauder, correct me if I am wrong but I think you are saying it was OK since he had nothing nefarious in mind?
So then, Kev, you go off on how things should be handled in the future. Ha. Are you aware that you are suggesting that some wrong has occurred ?? Amazing you libs, you are, like, in quicksand.
@kevcvs57 saidYou just stepped in it. Some of the lawyers rummaging through the files have NO security clearance. They go home, tell their wives all the secrets, and it goes out from there, from her bridge club to China.
Files are what get kept in an archive you right wing halfwit no one took the archives. Biden mishandled the files that he removed in order to do his job as vice president.
This whole thing should be a catalyst for people to demand a functioning system for tracking documents that have been removed and regular audits to ascertain were they are at any given time depending on t ...[text shortened]... esidents and vice presidents have undergo security clearance before they can handle these documents?
We keep najling this thread.
@averagejoe1 saidTry more branch water in your bourbon Joe your rambling utter nonsense again
Ahh, pure liberal segue. So, what are you off on, Kev? You are into the reason,, AS IF YOU KNOW the reason, that he took the files.
Help Me Rhonda. So, let us say that is his exact reason...... You see, it makes no difference, since the law was broken from the moment he left with them and went North instead of South, where the archives are. Marauder, correct me ...[text shortened]... you are suggesting that some wrong has occurred ?? Amazing you libs, you are, like, in quicksand.