@no1marauder saidyou shall soon see that 2020 was not a democratic election and biden did not get more legal votes than any president in US history.
2020 was "democracy at its finest" - over 155 million Americans voted and rejected Trump by more than 7 million votes.
You and Trump had no respect for democracy then; why pretend you have some now? Especially when Trump is being disqualified by Constitutional means for illegally trying to overthrow that democratic election.
@mott-the-hoople saidArticle 2 Section 4 covers the grounds for removal from those offices.
lets look at being removed constitutionally.
I will ask a question...
Does Article 2 sec 4 only cover the president, vice president and civil officers regarding treason, bribery, and other misdemeanors?
It says nothing about disqualification from those offices in the first place and is thus not relevant to this discussion.
@mott-the-hoople saidSure. Any day now.
you shall soon see that 2020 was not a democratic election and biden did not get more legal votes than any president in US history.
@no1marauder saidAh yes, was Trump not impeached while he was still president for incitement to insurrection and acquitted by the senate?
Article 2 Section 4 covers the grounds for removal from those offices.
It says nothing about disqualification from those offices in the first place and is thus not relevant to this discussion.
@Mott-The-Hoople
Trump was impeached TWICE you twit. Now the senate is regretting letting this traitor get off, since they are totally scared shyteless of Trump and his hold over his cult which you know all about.
@sonhouse saidI need to bring you and Marauder up to speed. The constitution does not mention, regarding qualifications to run for president, whether they have been impeached or not. So what you just typed is useless in this thread. Secondly, the requirements to run for president are, being born in this country, being 35 years or older, and have lived here for 14 years. But, None of the requirements say that they cannot have been suggested to have committed a crime, or have been convicted of having committed a crime.
@Mott-The-Hoople
Trump was impeached TWICE you twit. Now the senate is regretting letting this traitor get off, since they are totally scared shyteless of Trump and his hold over his cult which you know all about.
The Thirty Six pages on this thread are wasted ink. I am correct , of course, and haven’t bothered to jump in to this stupid thread. I will probably be waiting for SCOTUS. Certainly not for Marauder’s unbelievable soliloquies, none of which change a dam thing, and certainly not those of Sonhouse, who appears a bit biased. I am curious, how can you, Sonhouse, find so many horrible things about Trump but not one about Biden.?!!? Logical people like myself have a hard time following, don’t you know.
@no1marauder saidAll of your posts which I have glossed over have zero basis to be worthy to apply to this scenario. Sorry, I have no other way to put it. You and Sonhouse and a few hangers-on need to take a cold shower..
Article 2 Section 4 covers the grounds for removal from those offices.
It says nothing about disqualification from those offices in the first place and is thus not relevant to this discussion.
@mott-the-hoople saidPoint?
Ah yes, was Trump not impeached while he was still president for incitement to insurrection and acquitted by the senate?
Impeachment and it's trial are political processes that are not binding on future legal proceedings. Nothing in Section 3 of the 14th Amendment suggests otherwise.
@no1marauder saidyes it does, section 5
Point?
Impeachment and it's trial are political processes that are not binding on future legal proceedings. Nothing in Section 3 of the 14th Amendment suggests otherwise.
@no1marauder saidto use your reasoning any person , judge, election manager, etc can for what ever reason declare someone guilty of something and remove them from a ballot.
Point?
Impeachment and it's trial are political processes that are not binding on future legal proceedings. Nothing in Section 3 of the 14th Amendment suggests otherwise.
That is childish thinking. There would be a process controlled by congress
@mott-the-hoople saidEven assuming some due process is required, that was satisfied in this case by a full civil trial.
to use your reasoning any person , judge, election manager, etc can for what ever reason declare someone guilty of something and remove them from a ballot.
That is childish thinking. There would be a process controlled by congress
CSA rebels didn't get that.
@no1marauder saidthere was a war. 🙄
Even assuming some due process is required, that was satisfied in this case by a full civil trial.
CSA rebels didn't get that.
@mott-the-hoople saidYes, there was a "rebellion". But the authors of Section 3 of the 14th Amendment didn't limit the disqualification to those who engaged in "rebellion" but also included those who engaged in "insurrection".
there was a war. 🙄