@Mott-The-Hoople saidNote libs never state their position(s) straight about immigration, illegals, etc.
“The right-leaning websites that provide context and nuance and texture to a complex argument like immigration”
😂what is so hard for you on immigration laws?
https://www.facebook.com/share/r/1GFbEAyr2d/?mibextid=wwXIfr
Start with Shavixmir who says there should be no borders.
So here we have Wildgrass. Ask him if all illegals should be sent home. Ask him if illegals who are criminal should be sent home. (2 separate questions) Ask him if illegals, the nice sweet hard-working ones that Marauder talks about all the time, should be allowed to vote.
@AverageJoe1 saidWasnt this already answered a bunch of times Joe?
Note in your journals this answer of Wildgrass to a question, to wit: what has FOX news misreported?
@wildgrass saidSue answered, that was about it.
Wasnt this already answered a bunch of times Joe?
So, tell us your stance on immigrants
@AverageJoe1 saidWrong again little fella. I also answered. Fox lying about the 2020 election. Cost them 800 billion . Moron.
Sue answered, that was about it.
So, tell us your stance on immigrants
@AverageJoe1 saidi am honored that you mix me up with Sue. She is awesome. Thanks for the compliment.
yes i was wrong. You did indeed. I get you and suzianne mixed up a lot,, my bad. So I guess, they are right 99.2% of the time, since you fellers have nothing else?
@AverageJoe1 saidI would remove BP and ICE from harassing American citizens and put them back on the border where they belong. They would stay under DHS management, but hiring procedures would get the microscope treatment. Nobody with even a parking ticket or any history with incarceration would be allowed to apply for BP or ICE jobs. Nearly everyone who is not a career employee with BP or ICE would be replaced. Got a criminal history? You're out. Ever killed anyone, on or off the job? Out. Be clean or be gone.
Y'all let The Suzianne beat you out! She notes that FOX says Trump is a good president, and considers that a misrepresentation. Chalk one up for Suzianne.
While I have you, in your lengthy post on another thread, reciting all that you would do if you were in control (well-written, BTW), you did not mention what you would do with all of the illegal immigrants, and if you would re-open the border.
What would you do in that regard?
All undocumented workers currently in the country would be free to apply for citizenship.
@AverageJoe1 saidNo, No, and No.
So here we have Wildgrass. Ask him if all illegals should be sent home. Ask him if illegals who are criminal should be sent home. (2 separate questions) Ask him if illegals, the nice sweet hard-working ones that Marauder talks about all the time, should be allowed to vote.
As I already said, all undocumented workers, whether they are currently employed or not, are welcome to apply for citizenship. They may keep their job if they have one, apply for a job if they don't, and may stay here while the Naturalization process is worked out. 1 year maximum. After that time, if they are not a citizen, they will be deported.
Those who have been incarcerated for a crime will serve out their sentence. They may apply for citizenship after they have served their time. Their time limit for Naturalization will be six months after release. Habitual offenders will have a 'Three Strikes You're Out' rule placed on them. On the third incarceration, after they serve their time, they will be deported. No excuses.
Any US citizen, birthright or naturalized, shall be allowed to vote, including released offenders. Citizenship shall be the main qualifier.
Official visas shall extend these timelines for the duration of the visa.
@Mott-The-Hoople saidIt's mainly the cruelty served upon those who otherwise would have broken no laws.
“The right-leaning websites that provide context and nuance and texture to a complex argument like immigration”
😂what is so hard for you on immigration laws?
https://www.facebook.com/share/r/1GFbEAyr2d/?mibextid=wwXIfr
1 edit
@Suzianne saidLaws of immigration and citizenship have been the same for over 100 years. You people endeavor to change the rules of society, and are now wanting to change the rules of immigration. So does this mean that laws of immigration are wrong in the first place. Does this mean that we should not have to vet people prior to their coming into our country? Do you see how simple my questions are, that you cannot answer?
No, No, and No.
As I already said, all undocumented workers, whether they are currently employed or not, are welcome to apply for citizenship. They may keep their job if they have one, apply for a job if they don't, and may stay here while the Naturalization process is worked out. 1 year maximum. After that time, if they are not a citizen, they will be deported.
Tho ...[text shortened]... be the main qualifier.
Official visas shall extend these timelines for the duration of the visa.
There is only one answer to everything I just asked. None of which you agree with.
One more thing…Youdid not answer if these people that are not citizens should be allowed to vote. After all, Marsuder I think says since they work and pay taxes, that they should be allowed to vote. Are you in agreement with that?
@AverageJoe1 saidCan you not read?
Laws of immigration and citizenship have been the same for over 100 years. You people endeavor to change the rules of society, and are now wanting to change the rules of immigration. So does this mean that laws of immigration are wrong in the first place. Does this mean that we should not have to vet people prior to their coming into our country? Do you see how simple my ...[text shortened]... since they work and pay taxes, that they should be allowed to vote. Are you in agreement with that?
"Any US citizen, birthright or naturalized, shall be allowed to vote, including released offenders. Citizenship shall be the main qualifier."
I didn't mention non-citizens because they already cannot vote.
@Suzianne saidYes, we know that.
Can you not read?
"Any US citizen, birthright or naturalized, shall be allowed to vote, including released offenders. Citizenship shall be the main qualifier."
I didn't mention non-citizens because they already cannot vote.
But given the New World that we live in and Natural Law, and other such new matters of rules of society, do you think that people who are legally here but not citizens should be allowed to vote?
@AverageJoe1 saidI agree with voting laws. Most are Constitutional.
Yes, we know that.
But given the New World that we live in and Natural Law, and other such new matters of rules of society, do you think that people who are legally here but not citizens should be allowed to vote?
Non-citizens who are here legally cannot vote in federal elections.
They may vote in some local elections, but this is up to state laws, not federal laws. They may have to follow state residency requirements.
@AverageJoe1 saidDo you read?
Sue answered, that was about it.
So, tell us your stance on immigrants