@Mott-The-Hoople saidI don't think right wingers know what laws are anymore.
“The right-leaning websites that provide context and nuance and texture to a complex argument like immigration”
😂what is so hard for you on immigration laws?
https://www.facebook.com/share/r/1GFbEAyr2d/?mibextid=wwXIfr
@wildgrass saidWhat he means is that the real us have no idea about the new rules of society and thate we are not keeping up. THAT is what wildgrass means.. Am I wrong??
I don't think right wingers know what laws are anymore.
1 edit
@Mott-The-Hoople saidAlan dershowitz argued at length circa 1998 that Clinton be impeached for a BJ because you don't need to commit a crime to be impeached.
at what time should I read it?
10 years ago when cnn,cbs,nbc Ect were congratulating Ice for doing a great job...obama even gave Tom homan a medal'
Or now, when cnn,nbc, cbs abc ect are criticizing Ice for doing their job portraying them as demons?
Alan dershowitz argued at length in 2020 that trump should NOT be impeached because you must commit a crime to be impeached.
Was he right only once? Was he wrong both times? He says he just changed his mind.
1 edit
@AverageJoe1 saidPoor sue. I wrote this , as it says above '8 hrs ago.' Asking of her stance on immigrants, having 'read ' her comments.
Sue answered, that was about it.
So, tell us your stance on immigrants
From Wildgrass a few mintues ago.......
So, tell us your stance on immigrants
Do you read?
@AverageJoe1
Then Wildgrass, 17 minutes ago ....SEVENTEEN MINUTES... has smartass response , asking me if I had read Sue's comment..........................8 hours ago.
Yeah....I did, little faerie. You make me tired, wildgrass, you win in THAT department for sure. I left you in the dust.
@AverageJoe1 saidPathetic.
@AverageJoe1
Then Wildgrass, 17 minutes ago ....SEVENTEEN MINUTES... has smartass response , asking me if I had read Sue's comment..........................8 hours ago.
Yeah....I did, little faerie. You make me tired, wildgrass, you win in THAT department for sure. I left you in the dust.
@wildgrass saidIt appears you are caught making things up once again…
Alan dershowitz argued at length circa 1998 that Clinton be impeached for a BJ because you don't need to commit a crime to be impeached.
Alan dershowitz argued at length in 2020 that trump should NOT be impeached because you must commit a crime to be impeached.
Was he right only once? Was he wrong both times? He says he just changed his mind.
“AI Overview
Based on available records, Alan Dershowitz's commentary regarding Bill Clinton has generally focused on the legal aspects of the Monica Lewinsky scandal and, more recently, their mutual connection to Jeffrey Epstein.
Clinton Impeachment (1990s): During the impeachment of President Clinton, Dershowitz argued that while Clinton's actions were "immoral" and "contemptible," they did not constitute "high crimes and misdemeanors" justifying removal from office. He maintained that the conduct, while involving a false story, did not reach the level of a crime.
Epstein Files/Context: Recent unsealed documents from the Jeffrey Epstein case (2024–2025) confirm that both Bill Clinton and Alan Dershowitz were associates of Epstein and flew on his private planes. In this context, Dershowitz has been asked about his knowledge of the, at times, scandalous or sexual allegations against other,, prominent men, though he has specifically argued there was no "client list" and has denied knowing about sexual abuse involving minors.
Defense of Due Process: Dershowitz often uses the Clinton and Trump cases to discuss what he sees as the weaponization of the legal system, arguing that sexual indiscretions should not necessarily be criminalized or used to override the constitutional process.
Dershowitz has not made specific, publicized, or focused public remarks detailing or analyzing the,, specifics of the,, "blow job" itself in a personal manner, but rather has focused on the,, legal, constitutional, and political fallout of the scandal. ”
@Mott-The-Hoople saidProving once again that you don't read.
It appears you are caught making things up once again…
“AI Overview
Based on available records, Alan Dershowitz's commentary regarding Bill Clinton has generally focused on the legal aspects of the Monica Lewinsky scandal and, more recently, their mutual connection to Jeffrey Epstein.
Clinton Impeachment (1990s): During the impeachment of President Cli ...[text shortened]... nner, but rather has focused on the,, legal, constitutional, and political fallout of the scandal. ”
@Mott-The-Hoople saidIf I post the quote, you won't read it. Maybe AI can replace your entire brain.
Proving once again you are lying
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/dershowitz-says-hes-changed-mind-on-impeachment-requirements-argues-crime-must-be-committed
1 edit
@AverageJoe1 saidThis is capitalism, man. Why would the lame stream media start churning out writing by conservative voices if no one was there to read it?
What he means is that the real us have no idea about the new rules of society and thate we are not keeping up. THAT is what wildgrass means.. Am I wrong??
We've turned into a society where liberals read wide ranging news sources and contemporary literature, and conservative just watch TV.