@averagejoe1 said
See? I do not even know how to interpret those words. And he SURE doesn't know how to interpret mine. C'mon, Zahlanzi, tell us how stupid people eschewing seat belts is at all connected to relying on heating systems that are liable to freeze your family. You people could not admit to a point if you had a gun to your head. Automatic contrarian, ,maybe?
"I do not even know how to interpret those words."
It's not really hard. I don't respect you, I think you're dumb (and what's worse, dumb while being an ashole), and i have no interest in engaging you.
"And he SURE doesn't know how to interpret mine."
I did. It was another dumb post you made. This time however i don't care to tell you in what ways it's dumb.
"C'mon, Zahlanzi, tell us how stupid people eschewing seat belts is at all connected to relying on heating systems that are liable to freeze your family. "
No thanks. Somebody here already told you. You ignored them so why should i bother. Those analogies were pointed at the new guy (another one) on the off chance it's not another dummy account of yours or earls or patzering's (or whatever the fuk his name was)
EDIT: sorry i take it back. It's 98% you. Joined 13th of February and one of the first things he does is go on the forums and congratulate you on what a brilliant debater you are. Right.
"You people could not admit to a point if you had a gun to your head. "
We could and would. With people capable of actual debate. You don't qualify.