It is no secret that the super rich in the west are interested in population control. They know they cannot simply kill off people, but they do follow policies that all help to lower excess population.
It seems obvious that if you can increase the number of homosexual women, you can decrease population growth. Here is a study that supports what seems obvious.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5299536/
Remember we are talking about generalities, not specifics. This means any reference to individuals you might know has no relavence on the topic.
This does explain why certain countries want to advertise homosexuality, while others want to supress it. It is a reflection of the country's elites desire for population growth or population decline.
Why would a country want to push homosexuality among men? Men are known for having a strong sex drive and if you do not want them getting women pregnant, have them have sex with other men. It is a real win win for those who want population decline.
@eladar saidWhich overpopulated countries are advertising / encouraging homosexuality?
It is no secret that the super rich in the west are interested in population control. They know they cannot simply kill off people, but they do follow policies that all help to lower excess population.
It seems obvious that if you can increase the number of homosexual women, you can decrease population growth. Here is a study that supports what seems obvious.
https://w ...[text shortened]... ant, have them have sex with other men. It is a real win win for those who want population decline.
Or
Which underpopulated countries are trying to suppress homosexuality?
It looks like the opposite is the case.
@rajk999 saidNotice I said the elites of the country. It is not the only method, it is just one that is less directly forcing it on people. Simply make it part of the plan for a country that does not want to take the total authoritarian approach.
Which overpopulated countries are advertising / encouraging homosexuality?
Or
Which underpopulated countries are trying to suppress homosexuality?
It looks like the opposite is the case.
If you are an authoritarian state, then the more direct method would be the Chinese method.
It is no big secret that the US and Western Europe would like to see population control, but these nations do not have the option of the Chinese method.
You may ask, how then are countries who have a pro-homosexual stances but needing to stop the slide of their population decline going to survive?
Easy enough, import your population. You need to be multi-cultural.
This has the advantage of also lowering the population around the world.
The post that was quoted here has been removedLook at the study.
I suppose you missed my disclaimer that we are talking about groups in general, not individuals. The study shows that Lesbian women have far fewer children than heterosexual women. This is reality.
Btw, did I ever say it is the only means of population reduction that is being used by Western Elites?
@Duchess64
China has had the one child policy long enough to see the problem it created. Yet it has now been made part of the Chinese culture. Having a population made up of such a high ratio of men and not nearly enough women brings about issues.
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/china-says-its-gender-imbalance-most-serious-in-the-world/
I know it is a waste of time refuting your false accusations, but I did it this time.
@eladar saidAbsolutely ridiculous on so many levels.
It is no secret that the super rich in the west are interested in population control. They know they cannot simply kill off people, but they do follow policies that all help to lower excess population.
It seems obvious that if you can increase the number of homosexual women, you can decrease population growth. Here is a study that supports what seems obvious.
https://w ...[text shortened]... ant, have them have sex with other men. It is a real win win for those who want population decline.
The population in the U.S. is on decline for two reasons. Women are waiting longer to have children and so some may wait too long. More important are economic reasons. Many couples are deciding children are too expensive given the economic situation for 80% of the population, even those with college degrees. The middle class is shrinking. Childcare is expensive. Health care is unstable. There is a very weak social safety net in the U.S. Even those with a six figure salary are just a few months away from home foreclosure if their employment disappears and they cannot find work that pays as well as the last job. Note that the research I am presenting is from a respected source.
https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2021/05/07/with-a-potential-baby-bust-on-the-horizon-key-facts-about-fertility-in-the-u-s-before-the-pandemic/#:~:text=A%20variety%20of%20factors%20have,women%20and%20delays%20in%20marriage.
@eladar saidIs this thread about population control ?
It is no secret that the super rich in the west are interested in population control. They know they cannot simply kill off people, but they do follow policies that all help to lower excess population.
It seems obvious that if you can increase the number of homosexual women, you can decrease population growth. Here is a study that supports what seems obvious.
https://w ...[text shortened]... ant, have them have sex with other men. It is a real win win for those who want population decline.
Or homosexuality ?