@shavixmir saidI'm not that into sauces, anyways....
Increased vegetarianism… exactly what this world needs.
How the hell are you to make a great sauce without meat-based fond or stock??
And I seriously challenge anyone to a sauce making competition if they dare say something like: “vegetable stock” or “or use fish for the espagnole”.
Moronic!
But when I am, Instead of espagnole, I just use fish.
@philokalia saidYou don’t even comprehend what espagnole is, do you?
I'm not that into sauces, anyways....
But when I am, Instead of espagnole, I just use fish.
@philokalia saidActually, Pride Month commemorates the Stonewall Riots and are thus a celebration of the start of the movement to have LGBT+ be free of societal oppression and gain equal rights. https://nationaltoday.com/pride-month/
(1) "There is no pro-homosexuality...
"My proof of this is that there are people who dislike homosexuality."
... OK...
What do you call Pride Month with its thousands of corporate sponsors and the countless LGBTQ+ interest groups...? What do you call the limitless pockets with which they fund their cause in the courts..?
(2) There are, of course, environmental ...[text shortened]... ld support a far greater population with increased vegetarianism is what all the experts are saying.
To call it "pro-homosexual" is to misunderstand its purpose and be ignorant of the history. See https://www.history.com/news/stonewall-riots-timeline
@eladar saidHomosexuals do not always confine themselves to their own sex. Perhaps their very existence proves they breed more often than not. If homosexuality is not hereditary wouldn't it have to be a birth defect?
It is no secret that the super rich in the west are interested in population control. They know they cannot simply kill off people, but they do follow policies that all help to lower excess population.
It seems obvious that if you can increase the number of homosexual women, you can decrease population growth. Here is a study that supports what seems obvious.
https://w ...[text shortened]... ant, have them have sex with other men. It is a real win win for those who want population decline.
Personally, I think it is likely the former and not the latter. Is there any proof one way or the other?
@metal-brain saidWhy do some people like sprouts and some people don’t?
Homosexuals do not always confine themselves to their own sex. Perhaps their very existence proves they breed more often than not. If homosexuality is not hereditary wouldn't it have to be a birth defect?
Personally, I think it is likely the former and not the latter. Is there any proof one way or the other?
It’ll be some thing along those lines. Just some people like big breasts, some people like small breasts, some people like anal and some people want to be whipped.
@no1marauder saidYou beat me to it. Well done.
Actually, Pride Month commemorates the Stonewall Riots and are thus a celebration of the start of the movement to have LGBT+ be free of societal oppression and gain equal rights. https://nationaltoday.com/pride-month/
To call it "pro-homosexual" is to misunderstand its purpose and be ignorant of the history. See https://www.history.com/news/stonewall-riots-timeline
@shavixmir saidI'm a foster parent for a dog rescue group. We see many dogs every year that have been neglected or abused or dumped at a county shelter (and get euthanized if no one takes them). A few of us have adopted this as a motto, "Humans suck."
Humanity sucks.
@philokalia saidIt's also flat wrong.
The most interesting part of this report was where it showd that Lesbian & Bisexual adolescents report higher rates of pregnancy than heterosexual adolescents.
Sadly, no further research into this was done and no reason given.
@philokalia said1) What do I call it? I call it "getting better", but exactly like the Civil Rights Act taking 100 years to happen after the Emancipation Proclamation, it's not where it should be yet.
(1) "There is no pro-homosexuality...
"My proof of this is that there are people who dislike homosexuality."
... OK...
What do you call Pride Month with its thousands of corporate sponsors and the countless LGBTQ+ interest groups...? What do you call the limitless pockets with which they fund their cause in the courts..?
(2) There are, of course, environmental ...[text shortened]... ld support a far greater population with increased vegetarianism is what all the experts are saying.
2) I don't doubt that. Do you have any idea how much rainforest is cleared every year to grow beef for McDonald's alone?
@suzianne saidIt is a finding in the meta study which is in a peer reviewed journal and does take into account studies addressing this data:
It's also flat wrong.
"All five adolescent studies showed higher rates of pregnancies in LB girls compared with heterosexual girls. Figures Figures11 and and22 explore this further in lesbian and bisexual women separately. Figure Figure11 shows that the rate of pregnancy was significantly higher in teenage samples of lesbians compared with their heterosexual peers, whereas in whole population samples the reverse was true. "
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5299536/
It's an interesting data point though why this is true is speculative.