Homosexuality as a means of Population Control

@eladar said
Yes, I know, you are a true believer in that being gay or not has to do with genetics. Of course this has been demonstrated by identical twin studies to be false.

How many gay couples were there in the US culture in the 1940's compared to the US culture of today?

The same percentage. Roughly 10%.

But some societies aren’t free and people have to hide their emotions.

@shavixmir said
The same percentage. Roughly 10%.

But some societies aren’t free and people have to hide their emotions.

Really? Do you know that for a fact or are you just making things up?

I do not believe it is that high, at least according to the polls, but you can see a steady rise which means that something is influencing people.

https://news.gallup.com/poll/234863/estimate-lgbt-population-rises.aspx

The expansion in the number of Americans who identify as LGBT is driven primarily by the cohort of millennials, defined as those born between 1980 and 1999. The percentage of millennials who identify as LGBT expanded from 7.3% to 8.1% from 2016 to 2017, and is up from 5.8% in 2012. By contrast, the LGBT percentage in Generation X (those born from 1965 to 1979) was up only .2% from 2016 to 2017. There was no change last year in LGBT percentage among baby boomers (born 1946 through 1964) and traditionalists (born prior to 1946).

The post that was quoted here has been removed

Sorry, but that is only idiological belief, not a proven fact.

But hey, why should I expect you to understand the difference between your opinion and truth. As a matter of fact, I would expect you to believe your opinion is absolute truth.

@eladar said
@Suzianne

Perhaps you would prefer a US government source

https://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/PCAAB500.pdf


It will take some reading, so I doubt you will take the time to see what it says. Try reading pages 9-11.


Look at the date of this document. When did a pro-homosexual stance being to be propagated in US society? Was it before or after the release of this document?

The timing would be non-connected.

First of all, any LGBTQ+ in this country can tell you that our society, as a whole, is NOT "pro-homosexuality", in fact much the opposite. There are still places in America that, for anyone "coming out", would result in lower-wage jobs, if they could find one, and rednecks in their face all the time. Things are getting better, but there are still plenty of backward communities where things are as bad as they've ever been. This is primarily why most LGBTQ+ activism has concentrated in the urban areas where they can get more support.

Second of all, this very document you link to obviously feels that increasing world population is indeed a major concern. This renders your argument, that more homosexual people in the country is going to suddenly decrease population levels to a species-endangering low, completely uninformed and irrational.

@eladar said
Sorry, but that is only idiological belief, not a proven fact.

But hey, why should I expect you to understand the difference between your opinion and truth. As a matter of fact, I would expect you to believe your opinion is absolute truth.

It's a hell of a lot closer to the truth than your opinion.

@eladar said
Not secret? Abortion Clinics and Contraception are the most mainstream forms of population control. These are not secrets.

Stop reading that idiotic hli.org website.

It's turning you monumentally stupid.

@eladar said
Yes, I know, you are a true believer in that being gay or not has to do with genetics. Of course this has been demonstrated by identical twin studies to be false.

How many gay couples were there in the US culture in the 1940's compared to the US culture of today?

There are more gay couples now because society now (mostly) understands that suppressing them and not recognizing their rights is just sexual-preference-apartheid.

@eladar said
Did you read the Kissenger report?

I line my birdcage with it, is that close enough?

@eladar said
It is no secret that the super rich in the west are interested in population control. They know they cannot simply kill off people, but they do follow policies that all help to lower excess population.

It seems obvious that if you can increase the number of homosexual women, you can decrease population growth. Here is a study that supports what seems obvious.

https://w ...[text shortened]... ant, have them have sex with other men. It is a real win win for those who want population decline.

The most interesting part of this report was where it showd that Lesbian & Bisexual adolescents report higher rates of pregnancy than heterosexual adolescents.

Sadly, no further research into this was done and no reason given.

@suzianne said
The timing would be non-connected.

First of all, any LGBTQ+ in this country can tell you that our society, as a whole, is NOT "pro-homosexuality", in fact much the opposite. There are still places in America that, for anyone "coming out", would result in lower-wage jobs, if they could find one, and rednecks in their face all the time. Things are getting better, but ther ...[text shortened]... denly decrease population levels to a species-endangering low, completely uninformed and irrational.

(1) "There is no pro-homosexuality...

"My proof of this is that there are people who dislike homosexuality."

... OK...

What do you call Pride Month with its thousands of corporate sponsors and the countless LGBTQ+ interest groups...? What do you call the limitless pockets with which they fund their cause in the courts..?

(2) There are, of course, environmental concerns, but it has been proven time & time again that the impact on the environment is due to issues with energy and industry, and it has very little to do with agricutlural practices that could sustain an earth with a much larger population.

Indeed, the earth could support a far greater population with increased vegetarianism is what all the experts are saying.

The post that was quoted here has been removed

Jesus Christ. Is that actually a thing???

This world is mad.

@philokalia said
(1) "There is no pro-homosexuality...

"My proof of this is that there are people who dislike homosexuality."

... OK...

What do you call Pride Month with its thousands of corporate sponsors and the countless LGBTQ+ interest groups...? What do you call the limitless pockets with which they fund their cause in the courts..?

(2) There are, of course, environmental ...[text shortened]... ld support a far greater population with increased vegetarianism is what all the experts are saying.

Increased vegetarianism… exactly what this world needs.
How the hell are you to make a great sauce without meat-based fond or stock??

And I seriously challenge anyone to a sauce making competition if they dare say something like: “vegetable stock” or “or use fish for the espagnole”.

Moronic!